2020
DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_410_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adductor canal block: Effect of volume of injectate on sciatic extension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may reflect a component of continuous local anesthetic spread from the adductor canal to the genicular branches of the posterior obturator nerve as well as the popliteal plexus, which has been demonstrated in cadaveric studies 41 and in patients undergoing TKA. 42 This spread would potentially negate the benefit of the iPACK block for posterior compartment analgesia. We also noted that Tak and colleagues 28 reported a higher cumulative OME in patients who received an iPACK+ACB block versus control patients who received cACB at discharge only (time not specified); this outcome may be due to the limited duration of both single-injection iPACK and single-injection ACB versus extended duration provided by a continuous ACB catheter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may reflect a component of continuous local anesthetic spread from the adductor canal to the genicular branches of the posterior obturator nerve as well as the popliteal plexus, which has been demonstrated in cadaveric studies 41 and in patients undergoing TKA. 42 This spread would potentially negate the benefit of the iPACK block for posterior compartment analgesia. We also noted that Tak and colleagues 28 reported a higher cumulative OME in patients who received an iPACK+ACB block versus control patients who received cACB at discharge only (time not specified); this outcome may be due to the limited duration of both single-injection iPACK and single-injection ACB versus extended duration provided by a continuous ACB catheter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the injections in the distal femoral triangle spread dye into the popliteal fossa. A prospective, randomized trial injected 42 patients with either 20 or 40 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine during “adductor canal” block performed “with the FA immediately under the sartorius.” 42 This injection is likely in the distal femoral triangle. They demonstrated >50% of patients had diminished sensation in the distribution of the peroneal nerve, with a trend toward a greater proportion of patients with diminished sensation in the higher volume group.…”
Section: Pro—the Location For Injection Mattersmentioning
confidence: 99%