Addressing the need for indigenous and decolonized quantitative research methods in Canada

Abstract

Though qualitative methods are often an appropriate Indigenous methodology and have dominated the literature on Indigenous research methods, they are not the only methods available for health research. There is a need for decolonizing and Indigenizing quantitative research methods, particularly in the discipline of epidemiology, to better address the public health needs of Indigenous populations who continue to face health inequities because of colonial systems, as well as inaccurate and incomplete data collection about themselves. For the last two decades, researchers in colonized countries have been calling for a specifically Indigenous approach to epidemiology that recognizes the limits of Western epidemiological methods, incorporates more Indigenous research methodologies and community-based participatory research methods, builds capacity by training more Indigenous epidemiologists, and supports Indigenous self-determination. Indigenous epidemiology can include a variety of approaches, including: shifting standards, such as age standardization, according to Indigenous populations to give appropriate weight to their experiences; carefully setting recruitment targets and using appropriate recruitment methods to fulfill statistical standards for stratification; acting as a bridge between Indigenous and Western technoscientific perspectives; developing culturally appropriate data collection tools; and developing distinct epidemiological methods based on Indigenous knowledge systems. This paper explores how decolonization and Indigenization of epidemiology has been operationalized in recent Canadian studies and projects, including the First Nations Regional Longitudinal Health Survey and how this decolonization and Indigenization might be augmented with the capacity-building of the future Our Health Counts Applied Indigenous Epidemiology, Health Information, and Health Services and Program Evaluation Training and Mentorship Program in Canada.

Shifting paradigm from biomedical to decolonised methods in Inuit public health research in Canada: a scoping review

“…While there is a misconception that qualitative research is more culturally appropriate in Indigenous settings than quantitative research,9 174 175 we believe both are relevant and have a place in Inuit public health research; however, both must be culturally safe 9 176. In this review, little qualitative research was rooted in Inuit worldviews.…”

The need for sustainable funding for Indigenous doula services in Canada

“…Therefore, regulations governing Indigenous doulas, the training provided to Indigenous doulas, and the way in which data are collected and analysed need to be mindful of the specific cultural and social contexts of Indigenous peoples and their self-determination. For example, any data collection and analysis should be conducted with Indigenous data sovereignty and governance and decolonized epidemiology 55 in mind, including community-determined guidelines such as the CARE (Collective Benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility, Ethics) Principles. 56 Furthermore, Indigenous populations are greatly diverse across individual First Nations, Métis Nations, and Inuit, which needs to be taken into account when developing and providing doula training and evaluating cost-benefit.…”

Indigenous Research Methods to Build an Uncontested Space for Marketing Insight

“…For researchers, it is important to understand our positionality in the research context. This relationship is particularly important in undertaking marketing research with Indigenous peoples, based on the researcher and the relationship with the research topic and with the greater environment (Wilson, 2008), and this can highlight any biases through conscious and unconscious choices in the study design (Hayward et al, 2021; Jaworsky, 2019). Whilst Euro-western research assumes a neutral or objective position, Indigenous approaches are embedded with relationality as one’s perspective influences how the world is perceived (Archibald et al, 2019).…”