2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing the issue of exposure to primary pollution in urban areas: Application to Greater Paris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for multi-scale modelling, the main research efforts associated with these numerical approaches are directed towards the downscaling of simulated pollutant concentration fields in urban areas, the improvement of CTM forecast using additional observation data, and a refined representation of individual exposure at the street scale (Berrocal et al, 2020;Elessa Etuman et al, 2020). Gariazzo et al (2020) used a random forest model to enhance CTM results and produce improved population exposure estimates at 200 m resolution, in a multi-pollutant, multi-city, and multi-year study conducted over Italy.…”
Section: Use Of Advanced Numerical Approaches and Statistical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for multi-scale modelling, the main research efforts associated with these numerical approaches are directed towards the downscaling of simulated pollutant concentration fields in urban areas, the improvement of CTM forecast using additional observation data, and a refined representation of individual exposure at the street scale (Berrocal et al, 2020;Elessa Etuman et al, 2020). Gariazzo et al (2020) used a random forest model to enhance CTM results and produce improved population exposure estimates at 200 m resolution, in a multi-pollutant, multi-city, and multi-year study conducted over Italy.…”
Section: Use Of Advanced Numerical Approaches and Statistical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P. Wang et al, 2015;Zhan et al, 2017;Just et al, 2020;Alimissis et al, 2018). CTMs have also been developed to improve spatial resolution, for example, through downscaling approaches for predicting air quality in urban areas, forecast-ing air quality, and simulation of exposure at the street scale (Berrocal et al, 2020;Elessa Etuman et al, 2020;. Ensemble simulations have proven to be successful to provide more reliable air quality prediction and forecasting (e.g.…”
Section: Air Quality Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for multi-scale modelling, the main research efforts associated with these numerical approaches are directed towards the downscaling of simulated pollutant concentration fields in urban areas, the improvement of CTM forecast using additional observation data, and a refined representation of individual exposure at the street scale (Berrocal et al, 2020, Elessa Etuman et al, 2020. Gariazzo et al (2020) used a random forest model to enhance CTM results and produce improved population exposure estimates at 200m resolution, in a multi-pollutant, multi-city and multi-year study conducted over Italy.…”
Section: Use Of Advanced Numerical Approaches and Statistical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New approaches of artificial neural network models and machine learning have shown a more detailed representation of air quality in complex built-up areas (e.g., Wang et al, 2015b, Zhan et al, 2017, Just et al, 2020, Alimissis et al, 2018. CTMs have also been developed to improve spatial resolution, for example, through downscaling approaches for predicting air quality in urban areas, forecasting air quality and simulation of exposure at the street scale (Berrocal et al, 2020, Elessa Etuman et al, 2020. Ensemble simulations have proven to be successful to provide more reliable air quality prediction and forecasting (e.g., Galmarini et al, 2012 and complementary hybrid approaches have been explored for multi-scale applications (Galmarini et al, 2018).…”
Section: Air Quality Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dhondt et al(48) obtained more sharply contrasted results, with an average dynamic exposure value higher than the static value for NO 2(21.6 versus 20:98 mg=m 3 ) yet lower for ozone (79.7 versus 81:2 mg=m 3 ).Hatzopoulou and Miller (43) showed that, in the case of Toronto, the distribution of cumulative NO x concentrations throughout the day by individuals presents a larger range of values than that obtained with a static approach. Similarly, the work of Elessa Etuman et al(51) suggested that, in the case of Greater Paris (Grand Paris), the distribution of individual exposure to NO…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%