Addressing the Health of Formerly Imprisoned Persons in a Distressed Neighborhood Through a Community Collaborative Board

Abstract

This article provides a case study evaluating the structure and dynamic process of a Community Collaborative Board that had the goal of creating an evidence-based substance abuse/health intervention for previously incarcerated individuals. Meeting agendas, attendance, minutes, video recording of meetings, and in-depth interviews with 13 Community Collaborative Board members were used to conduct an independent process evaluation. Open coding identified quotes exemplifying specific themes and/or patterns across answers related to the desired domain. Several themes were identified regarding membership engagement, retention, and power distribution. Results showed member retention was due to strong personal commitment to the targeted problem. Analysis also revealed an unequal power distribution based on participants' background. Nevertheless, the development of an innovative, community-based health intervention manual was accomplished. Aspects of the process, such as incentives, subcommittees, and trainings, enhanced the Board's ability to integrate the community and scientific knowledge to accomplish its research agenda. Community-based participatory research was a useful framework in enhancing quality and efficiency in the development of an innovative, substance abuse/health intervention manual for distressed communities. Overall, this article sheds light on a process that illustrates the integration of community-based and scientific knowledge to address the health, economic, and societal marginalization of low-income, minority communities.

Critical Consciousness: A Critique and Critical Analysis of the Literature

“…Census Bureau 2015; U.S. Department of Justice 2014), the impact of a criminal record on employment is confounded with race (Alexander 2010; Pager 2003; Smith and Jemal 2015). Income and education factors, which are integrally related and occur along racial and ethnic lines, are significant predictors of health status (Sambamoorthi and McAlpine 2003; Viruell-Fuentes et al 2012).…”

Transformative Consciousness of Health Inequities: Oppression Is a Virus and Critical Consciousness Is the Antidote

“…Social workers with CTC could: 1) address oppressive sociopolitical contexts; 2) create therapeutic alliances that validate the client’s reality and experiences; 3) help clients navigate oppressive systems of care, while simultaneously acting to change those systems; 4) recognize and challenge personal biases and the biases of others; and 5) take collaborative action with communities to address socio-structural determinants of health inequities (Hernandez et al, 2005; Garcia et al, 2009; Mullaly, 2002; Sakamoto & Pitner, 2005). This process includes holding themselves accountable for reflecting on power dynamics; continuously examining how personal biases, assumptions and normative values influence perceptions of differences between individuals; owning one’s contributions to social injustice; and developing partnerships that forge a war on oppression and privilege rather than against individuals trapped in marginalized statuses (Smith & Jemal, 2015; Garcia et al, 2009; Sakamoto & Pitner, 2005). …”

Community Wise: The Development of an Anti-Oppression Model to Promote Individual and Community Health

“…A manuscript reporting the findings is currently being reviewed for publication. Results showed that board members felt comfortable expressing their opinions in the meetings, and there was a high level of satisfaction with the project (Smith & Jemal, revise and resubmit). …”