The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1109/tste.2020.3026370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing the Conditional and Correlated Wind Power Forecast Errors in Unit Commitment by Distributionally Robust Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Constraints ( 28) and ( 29) enforce minimum-up-time and -down-time restrictions, respectively. Constraints (30) define the values of s ti and h ti based on intertemporal changes in u ti . Constraints (31) and ( 32) impose integrality restrictions and ( 33) and ( 34) impose non-negativity.…”
Section: B Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Constraints ( 28) and ( 29) enforce minimum-up-time and -down-time restrictions, respectively. Constraints (30) define the values of s ti and h ti based on intertemporal changes in u ti . Constraints (31) and ( 32) impose integrality restrictions and ( 33) and ( 34) impose non-negativity.…”
Section: B Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, operational wind-integration costs can be reduced by modifying power-system operations. Such adjustment can be done using a stochastic, robust, or distributionally robust approach to modeling unit commitment [25] - [30]. Such approaches account explicitly for uncertain real-time wind availability in deciding unit commitment and dispatch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been presented in the literature to model the uncertainties associated with the output generation of renewable-based generating units [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. However, some works have taken a deterministic approach when dealing with the output power of solar panels [27][28][29].…”
Section: Solar Panels Output Uncertainty Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in [30,31] robust optimization method is used to consider the uncertainties, therefore the worst scenarios are characterized in these works. On the other hand, distributional robust optimization (DRO) are used in the literature which is a modelling approach that assumes only partial distributional information [32], whereas probabilistic optimization assumes complete distributional information. As the probability distribution of the solar radiation uncertainty is known, a probabilistic approach is preferred in this work.…”
Section: Solar Panels Output Uncertainty Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of these advantages, distributionally robust optimization has been successfully applied in different fields of power systems, including unit commitment [13], optimal power flow [14], energy and reserve co-dispatch [15], and integrated energy systems [16]. Reference [17] studied a day-ahead unit commitment problem with stochastic wind power generations, where a distributionally robust optimization approach was employed to address wind power forecast errors. In this regard, the spatiotemporal correlation in wind power generations was captured appropriately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%