Introduction: Split liver transplantation (SLT) enables two recipients to be transplanted using a single donor liver; typically, an adult and a child. Despite equivalent long-term outcomes to whole grafts in selected adults, the use of these grafts in high-risk adult recipients with high model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores (≥30), a poor pretransplant clinical status (ICU or hospital-bound), acute liver failure or retransplantation remains controversial.
Methods:We retrospectively analyzed all deceased donor adult liver transplants performed between July 2002 and November 2019 at a single high-volume center and performed a propensity score-matched analysis. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess utility of these grafts for high-risk recipients.Results: A total of 1090 adult liver transplants were performed, including 155 SLT (14%). Graft survival at 1-, 3-and 5-years were comparable between recipients of split and whole liver grafts (82%, 79% and 74% vs. 86%, 81% and 77%, respectively, log rank P = .537), as was patient survival at 1-, 3-and 5-years. Recipients of split grafts were more likely to have biliary complications and hepatic artery thrombosis, but equivalent long-term survival. Recipients with high MELD scores or a poor pre-transplant clinical status had similar patient and graft survival and complication profiles irrespective of whether they received split or whole grafts.
Conclusions:SLT is an important method for addressing donor shortages and provides comparable long-term outcomes in adult recipients despite an increase in short-term complications. SLT use in high-risk recipients should be considered to allow for sickestfirst allocation policies.