Addressing the Aviation and Climate Change Challenge: A Review of Options

Gehring, Markus W.; Robb, Cairo A. R.

doi:10.7215/gp_in_20131126

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One example of the interactions between trade and climate policy was the unilateral attempt by the EU to level the playing field in terms of the carbon cost for aviation by forcing all airlines landing in or taking off from EU airports to buy emission allowances within the EU ETS, making no distinction between Annex 1 and non-Annex 1 destinations or airlines. The EU had to withdraw this proposal as neither the US (citing the Chicago Convention) nor the Chinese (citing the UNFCCC) could accept this initiative (Gehring & Robb, 2013).…”

Section: Negotiating Issues Relevant To Eiismentioning

confidence: 99%

Global climate policy and deep decarbonization of energy-intensive industries

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

If we are to limit global warming to 2 8C, all sectors in all countries must reduce their emissions of GHGs to zero not later than 2060-2080. Zero-emission options have been less explored and are less developed in the energy-intensive basic materials industries than in other sectors. Current climate policies have not yet motivated major efforts to decarbonize this sector, and it has been largely protected from climate policy due to the perceived risks of carbon leakage and a focus on short-term reduction targets to 2020. We argue that the future global climate policy regime must develop along three interlinked and strategic lines to facilitate a deep decarbonization of energy-intensive industries. First, the principle of common but differentiated responsibility must be reinterpreted to allow for a dialogue on fairness and the right to development in relation to industry. Second, a greater focus on the development, deployment and transfer of technology in this sector is called for. Third, the potential conflicts between current free trade regimes and motivated industrial policies for deep decarbonization must be resolved. One way forward is to revisit the idea of sectoral approaches with a broader scope, including not only emission reductions, but recognizing the full complexity of low-carbon transitions in energy-intensive industries. A new approach could engage industrial stakeholders, support technology research, development and demonstration and facilitate deployment through reducing the risk for investors. The Paris Agreement allows the idea of sectoral approaches to be revisited in the interests of reaching our common climate goals. Policy relevance Deep decarbonization of energy-intensive industries will be necessary to meet the 2 8C target. This requires major innovation efforts over a long period. Energy-intensive industries face unique challenges from both innovation and technical perspectives due to the large scale of facilities, the character of their global markets and the potentially high mitigation costs. This article addresses these challenges and discusses ways in which the global climate policy framework should be developed after the Paris Agreement to better support transformative change in the energy-intensive industries.

show abstract

Section: Negotiating Issues Relevant To Eiismentioning

confidence: 99%