2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3314658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing Systemic Risk Using Contingent Convertible Debt — A Network Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both theoretical and empirical points of view were adopted and led to original operational research methodologies (e.g. Calabrese and Osmetti, 2019;Gupta et al, 2021). Indeed, the overall knowledge of the level of systemic risk associated with each single company or financial instrument reveals several advantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both theoretical and empirical points of view were adopted and led to original operational research methodologies (e.g. Calabrese and Osmetti, 2019;Gupta et al, 2021). Indeed, the overall knowledge of the level of systemic risk associated with each single company or financial instrument reveals several advantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these recent contributions, Feinstein and Hurd (2020) is closest in spirit to our paper, proving existence of equilibrium in a model with accountingbased triggers but allowing, e.g., for CoCos with different maturities. Gupta et al (2020) show both in simulations and empirically that CoCos are an effective instrument for mitigating systemic risk. Beyond simple accounting-based triggers, they also consider extensions where conversion mechanisms take into account the balance sheets of the entire banking system.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 94%
“…We refer to Glasserman and Nouri (2012); Avdjiev et al (2013); Spiegeleer et al (2018) for detailed discussion of specific kinds of convertible bonds and methodologies for pricing these obligations in a single institution setting. Gupta et al (2019) presents a case study of the use of contingent convertible debts for reducing systemic risk when all such obligations are due outside the financial system. The present model of networks with contingent convertible obligations is, fundamentally, a variation of the network clearing model first proposed by Eisenberg and Noe (2001) that accounts for bankruptcy costs as proposed in Rogers and Veraart (2013), and equity crossholdings between financial institutions as modeled in Suzuki (2002); Gouriéroux et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%