2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing subjective decision-making inherent in GLUE-based multi-criteria rainfall–runoff model calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pseudo‐likelihood function of KGE is used to assess model performance. The less subjective selection criteria are a common practice in the literature; thus, we use a behavioural parameter set, which subjectively meets the desired performance criteria (Li & Xu, ; Shafii, Tolson, & Matott, ; Stedinger, Vogel, Lee, & Batchelder, ). These methods fail to account for output uncertainty; therefore, we use a simple method of selecting the top 10% of the model simulations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pseudo‐likelihood function of KGE is used to assess model performance. The less subjective selection criteria are a common practice in the literature; thus, we use a behavioural parameter set, which subjectively meets the desired performance criteria (Li & Xu, ; Shafii, Tolson, & Matott, ; Stedinger, Vogel, Lee, & Batchelder, ). These methods fail to account for output uncertainty; therefore, we use a simple method of selecting the top 10% of the model simulations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kling–Gupta efficiency (Gupta, Kling, Yilmaz, & Martinez, ; I KGE ) was used as performance metric for the individual objectives: IKGE=1r12+α12+β12, where r is the linear correlation coefficient between simulation and observation; α (α = σ m /σ o ) is a measure of relative variability in the simulated and observed values, where σ m is the standard deviation of simulated variables and σ o is the standard deviation of observed variables; β is the ratio between the average value of simulated and observed variables. The 1% (5,000) best performing parameter sets were retained as behavioural and used to establish feasible posterior distributions and to construct model uncertainty ranges, using I KGE_HGS as informal likelihood measure (GLUE; Beven & Binley, ; Freer, McMillan, McDonnell, & Beven, ; Shafii, Tolson, & Shawn, ; Zhang, Li, Guo, & Gong, ).…”
Section: Model Evaluation Calibration Evaluation and Transferabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient used in this study is known to be sensitive to large values (Krause et al, 2005); thus it weighs heavy on peaks rather than recession and baseflow components of hydrographs. Despite the expected bias in model performance evaluation, the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient was chosen as a single performance statistics in this study because of its proven applicability as an informal likelihood function (Setegn et al, 2010;Xie and Lian, 2013;Shafii et al, 2015). In addition, it has been commonly used as an objective function in parameter calibration and/or goodness-of-fit statistics in evaluation of hydrologic models (Krause et al, 2005;Engel et al, 2007;Moriasi et al, 2007); thus, use of the coefficient was expected to make the results of this study be more easily interpreted by other researchers and transferred to other modelling studies.…”
Section: Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation Framework and mentioning
confidence: 99%