2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2019.112642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing soluble target interference in the development of a functional assay for the detection of neutralizing antibodies against a BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A drug target, when present at sufficiently high concentrations in the bloodstream, may interfere with the performance of ADA and NAb assays, leading to either false-positive or, in some cases, false-negative ADA and NAb assay results [ 58 ]. Related mitigation approaches include the use of anti-target antibodies [ 59 ], soluble versions of the receptors [ 60 ], target-binding proteins [ 61 ], lectins [ 62 ], and solid-phase removal of targets. For example, Wang et al used polyclonal anti-soluble B-cell maturation antigen (sBCMA) antibodies as scavengers to deplete sBCMA at a concentration four times greater than the median level of this tumor-associated antigen observed in the multiple myeloma patient population, thereby mitigating sBCMA interference in the related functional assay for the detection of neutralizing antibodies against a BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody [ 59 ].…”
Section: Factors That Interfere With the Assay Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A drug target, when present at sufficiently high concentrations in the bloodstream, may interfere with the performance of ADA and NAb assays, leading to either false-positive or, in some cases, false-negative ADA and NAb assay results [ 58 ]. Related mitigation approaches include the use of anti-target antibodies [ 59 ], soluble versions of the receptors [ 60 ], target-binding proteins [ 61 ], lectins [ 62 ], and solid-phase removal of targets. For example, Wang et al used polyclonal anti-soluble B-cell maturation antigen (sBCMA) antibodies as scavengers to deplete sBCMA at a concentration four times greater than the median level of this tumor-associated antigen observed in the multiple myeloma patient population, thereby mitigating sBCMA interference in the related functional assay for the detection of neutralizing antibodies against a BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody [ 59 ].…”
Section: Factors That Interfere With the Assay Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related mitigation approaches include the use of anti-target antibodies [ 59 ], soluble versions of the receptors [ 60 ], target-binding proteins [ 61 ], lectins [ 62 ], and solid-phase removal of targets. For example, Wang et al used polyclonal anti-soluble B-cell maturation antigen (sBCMA) antibodies as scavengers to deplete sBCMA at a concentration four times greater than the median level of this tumor-associated antigen observed in the multiple myeloma patient population, thereby mitigating sBCMA interference in the related functional assay for the detection of neutralizing antibodies against a BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody [ 59 ]. For another example, Dengler et al managed to overcome the interference of prior checkpoint inhibitor with the immunogenicity assays by using antibodies specific to pembrolizumab or nivolumab [ 63 ].…”
Section: Factors That Interfere With the Assay Performancementioning
confidence: 99%