2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing solar modulation and long-term uncertainties in scaling secondary cosmic rays for in situ cosmogenic nuclide applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
212
1
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
2
212
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For the timedependent adaptation of the Lal (1991) -Stone (2000 scaling model (cf. Balco et al, 2008) the difference is ~15%, whereas the scaling schemes of Dunai (2001), Desilets and Zreda (2003), Desilets et al (2006), and Lifton et al (2005) lead to denudation rates that are about 30 to 40% higher than those reported herein. The exact differences depend on, among other factors, the integration time and the sample elevation, because the altitude-dependence of nuclide production slightly differs in the various scaling models.…”
Section: Uncertainties Of the 10 Be Denudation Ratescontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the timedependent adaptation of the Lal (1991) -Stone (2000 scaling model (cf. Balco et al, 2008) the difference is ~15%, whereas the scaling schemes of Dunai (2001), Desilets and Zreda (2003), Desilets et al (2006), and Lifton et al (2005) lead to denudation rates that are about 30 to 40% higher than those reported herein. The exact differences depend on, among other factors, the integration time and the sample elevation, because the altitude-dependence of nuclide production slightly differs in the various scaling models.…”
Section: Uncertainties Of the 10 Be Denudation Ratescontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…2) indicate that during the last glacial cycle glaciers descended down to ~4800 m on the northern slope of the mountain range and to about 4300-4500 m on its southern margin (Lehmkuhl et al, 2002;Klinge and Lehmkuhl, 2004). In the southern part of the Nyainqentanglha Shan, boulders from a sequence of three moraines yielded 10 Be exposure ages of ~34 ka, ~25 ka, and ~12 ka (Chevalier et al, 2011; the exposure ages were calculated with the scaling scheme of Lifton et al, 2005). Five boulders from an even older moraine in the eastern part of the mountain range have minimum 10 Be ages between ~50 ka and ~110 ka and indicate a slightly larger ice extent during the penultimate glaciation (Owen et al, 2005).…”
Section: Evaluating Past Burial Of the Peneplain By Glaciers Or Cold-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bromley et al [37] defined a lower moraine group (~5000-4900 m), extending to the lower area of the glacial valleys, as CI and a higher moraine group (~5500 m), deposited in the middle part of the Santiago valley, as CII. For each group of moraines they found two age ranges, depending on the scaling model used: Lm [70] or Li [71][72][73]: -CI moraines:~25-15 ka (Lm) and~21-12 ka (Li), with outlier ages~47 and~31 ka (Li) and~61 and~37 ka (Lm). -CII moraines:~11-12 ka (Lm) and~11-8 ka (Li).…”
Section: Snowlines Elas and Glacial Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shielded samples were used to correct for remaining mantle-derived and nucleogenic 3 He (40), which only averaged 6% of the total measured 3 He (Table S1). Accumulation ages and production rates (Tables S1 and S2) were calculated using the Lifton/Sato scaling scheme (41,42) on the CRONOS 3 He calculator (43,44).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%