2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2844181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing RFID Misreadings to Better Infer Bee Hive Activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, we furthermore only used data when pairings of readings of the first and second scanners matched. Based on our own observations, a foraging trip was defined as a bee being outside the hive for more than 180 s. This includes bees on a short mission as defined by Susanto et al (). Onset of foraging was defined as follows: when a bee left the hive for two trips on one day, this day was counted as day of initiation of foraging.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, we furthermore only used data when pairings of readings of the first and second scanners matched. Based on our own observations, a foraging trip was defined as a bee being outside the hive for more than 180 s. This includes bees on a short mission as defined by Susanto et al (). Onset of foraging was defined as follows: when a bee left the hive for two trips on one day, this day was counted as day of initiation of foraging.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a desirable outcome as it confirms the system is robust to misreadings (i.e., bees passing by antennas and not being detected). Misreadings in RFID systems can be caused by several factors including distance between the RFID tag and the antenna, power shortages, and inappropriate duty cycle set up ([ 10 ], and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Success rate in detection are reported to vary considerably (e.g., [ 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ], and references therein). A recent approach proposes methods to address misreadings of RFID detections using data from the entire cohort of bees fitted with those devices to infer individual behaviour [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time a drone spent outside the hive was the time span between a recorded “Departure” and a subsequent “Arrival” of the same individual. The time spans obtained were categorized based on Susanto et al (2018) [ 32 ] ( Table 1 ). During the categorization we made the following assumptions: If the drones leave and enter the hive frequently, i.e., between 1 s and 3 min, they are exiting to defecate or beard (see Figure 2 ) and entering to feed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%