2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-022-00695-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing racial disparities in surgical care with machine learning

Abstract: There is ample evidence to demonstrate that discrimination against several population subgroups interferes with their ability to receive optimal surgical care. This bias can take many forms, including limited access to medical services, poor quality of care, and inadequate insurance coverage. While such inequalities will require numerous cultural, ethical, and sociological solutions, artificial intelligence-based algorithms may help address the problem by detecting bias in the data sets currently being used to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are consistent with previous reports demonstrating inequitable care of Black/minority patients relative to other facets of CRC care, such as cancer screening, delayed surgical intervention, and receipt of guideline-compliant care. 35–39 The findings underscore the interplay between race/ethnicity and FI, demonstrating that minority patients residing in high FI regions may be disproportionately predisposed to greater social and health disparities relative to CRC care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…These data are consistent with previous reports demonstrating inequitable care of Black/minority patients relative to other facets of CRC care, such as cancer screening, delayed surgical intervention, and receipt of guideline-compliant care. 35–39 The findings underscore the interplay between race/ethnicity and FI, demonstrating that minority patients residing in high FI regions may be disproportionately predisposed to greater social and health disparities relative to CRC care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Without a critical assessment of digital technologies from an equity lens, these disparities may continue to be perpetuated. Halamka et al highlight the importance of using existing bias detection tools to detect irregularities in datasets and algorithms before deploying them in surgical practice 23 .…”
Section: Emerging Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid such traps, XAI should be designed to consider the specific needs of each target group (clinicians and developers). For developers, increasing model interpretability is important to assess the reliability of the model and eliminate bias 15,16 . For clinicians, clinical plausibility is most relevant to facilitate clinical sense-making of system outcomes 4,17,18 .…”
Section: Interviews and Focus Group With Clinicians And Developersmentioning
confidence: 99%