2022
DOI: 10.33225/pec/22.80.499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing Pre-Service Teachers’ Misconceptions and Promoting Conceptual Understanding Through the Conceptual Change Model

Abstract: Teaching science concepts for conceptual understanding has its challenges. Bringing about conceptual change in the science classroom can be difficult because most concepts are complicated and often counter-intuitive in the teaching and learning of science concepts. A review of the literature indicates that the conceptual change model, CCM can be an effective teaching technique in addressing misconceptions and improving conceptual understanding when it comes to science instruction. The aim of this research was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The underlining conception is that students learn concepts through realistic experiences and challenges; this learning takes place in small cooperative groups with teachers being facilitators of learning (Baker & Robinson, 2016;Rihtaršič et al, 2016). Kolb's experiential learning theory, popularly called the four-stage cycle of learning or Kolb cycle, is based on the following: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation, which are repeated several times to ultimately achieve the desired learning objectives of a particular lesson (Addido et al, 2022b;Rihtaršič et al, 2016).…”
Section: Experiential Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlining conception is that students learn concepts through realistic experiences and challenges; this learning takes place in small cooperative groups with teachers being facilitators of learning (Baker & Robinson, 2016;Rihtaršič et al, 2016). Kolb's experiential learning theory, popularly called the four-stage cycle of learning or Kolb cycle, is based on the following: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation, which are repeated several times to ultimately achieve the desired learning objectives of a particular lesson (Addido et al, 2022b;Rihtaršič et al, 2016).…”
Section: Experiential Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptual understanding is a crucial aspect of science learning as it enables students to develop a deep understanding of scientific concepts, transfer their knowledge to new situation, and utilize acquired scientific knowledge in order to explain and interpret everyday facts (Addido et al, 2022;Echempati, 2014;Schwortz & Burrows, 2021). Conceptual understanding is an important variable to fulfill before progressing further in learning (Handhika et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptual understanding is an important variable to fulfill before progressing further in learning (Handhika et al, 2017). It involves equipping students with the necessary skills to comprehend and interpret scientific ideas, allowing them to build on their knowledge and apply it creatively (Addido et al, 2022). Conceptual understanding goes beyond mere memorization and encourages students to formulate their own ideas and ask questions based on their understanding (Anim-Eduful & Adu-Gyamfi, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These elements may contribute to the formation of misconceptions, which are individual ideas (Blonder and Mamlok-Naaman, 2019) views, and understandings that are inconsistent with commonly accepted scientific meaning. Students may hold into such misconceptions from their secondary education, moreover, these cognitive frameworks and experiences can impede their absorption of fresh ideas (Addido et al, 2022). People comprehend the world by constructing interpretations that make sense of their surroundings, drawing from their personal experiences and preexisting knowledge (Slater et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%