Addressing Parents’ Vaccine Concerns: A Randomized Trial of a Social Media Intervention

Daley, Matthew F.; Narwaney, Komal J.; Shoup, Jo Ann; Wägner, Nicole; Glanz, Jason M.

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.010

Cited by 131 publications

(125 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

121

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We retrieved a total of 6,277 studies. After removal of duplicates and screening of titles and abstracts, 22 full texts remained, of which 16 were included in the narrative synthesis [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] (see Figure 1). The main features of the included studies are summarized in Table 1.…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The main features of the included studies are summarized in Table 1. All but one were quantitative studies, 30 and three had an experimental design: we included two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effectiveness of interventions at improving parental knowledge of and attitudes toward vaccination, with baseline data collected during pregnancy, 33,40 and a pilot study that evaluated the impact of an education course on the attitudes of pregnant women toward childhood immunization. 44 We also included a cohort study aimed at exploring changes in attitudes toward vaccination over time, during pregnancy and 3, 6 and 14 months after childbirth.…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All studies were conducted in western nations, with the exception of one conducted in Japan 32 and one in Malaysia. 36 Most quantitative studies made use of an ad hoc questionnaire specifically developed for the purpose of the research project, although three of them 36,37,40 used a version of the questionnaire developed by Opel et al for the Parent Attitudes and Childhood Vaccines (PACV) survey, 45,46 which was adapted for pregnant women. The original PACV survey was self-administered and contained 15 items in three domains (behavior, safety and efficacy, and general attitudes), and in the three studies cited it was slightly modified to include specific items relating to expectant mothers.…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Factors affecting the vaccination choices of pregnant women for their children: a systematic review of the literature

Rosso

Massimi

Pitini

et al. 2020

Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, an increase in vaccine hesitancy has led to a decrease in vaccination coverage in several countries. We conducted a systematic review of studies that assessed knowledge of and attitudes toward pediatric vaccinations, and the vaccination choices and their determinants among pregnant women. A total of 6,277 records were retrieved, and 16 full texts were included in the narrative synthesis. The published literature on the topic shows that, overall, pregnant women believe that vaccines are important for the protection of their children and the community, but various concerns and misunderstandings persist around vaccine safety and efficacy, which reduce the trust of expectant mothers in immunization. Nevertheless, such attitudes and choices vary depending on the vaccine being considered and the corresponding determinants should therefore be studied in the context of each specific vaccination. Further research on this topic is needed, particularly in non-western countries.

show abstract

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Factors affecting the vaccination choices of pregnant women for their children: a systematic review of the literature

Rosso

Massimi

Pitini

et al. 2020

Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Presenting both the potential benefits and potential harms of vaccines is also key. Studies in other countries have shown this to be a promising approach for increasing vaccine acceptance (17)(18)(19)).…”

Section: Identify Target Audience and Establish Trustmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimizing communication material to address vaccine hesitancy

Dubé

Gagnon

Vivion

2020

CCDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vaccine hesitancy (the reluctance to accept recommended vaccines) is a complex issue that poses risk communication challenges for public health authorities and clinicians. Studies have shown that providing too much evidence on vaccine safety and efficacy to those who are vaccine-hesitant has done little to stem the growth of hesitancy-related beliefs and fears. The objective of this paper is to describe good practices in developing communication materials to address vaccine hesitancy. An inventory of vaccination communication materials in Canada was assessed according to the Council of Canadian Academies Expert Panel on Health Product Risk Communication Evaluation (2015). Many of the current communication products could be improved to better align with evidence-based risk communication best practices. Five best practices were identified. First, identify target audience and establish trust. Second, provide both the risks and benefits of vaccination, as most people are looking for balanced information. Third, give the facts before addressing the myths. Fourth, use visual aids. Fifth, test communication material prior to launch. Applying these best practices to current or future communication products will help vaccine providers (including physicians, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, public health professionals) to develop communication materials that are sensitive to the complex ways that people process and value information and thus more likely to optimize vaccine uptake in their communities.

show abstract

“…Il est également essentiel de présenter à la fois les avantages et préjudices potentiels des vaccins. Des études d'autres pays indiquent qu'il s'agit d'une démarche prometteuse pour accroître l'acceptation des vaccins(17)(18)(19).La recherche démontre que les personnes confrontées à de l'information qui contredit leurs valeurs peuvent se sentir menacées et réagir de manière défensive. Cette situation crée de la résistance, ce qui renforce leurs croyances initiales et réduit les chances de se livrer au comportement souhaité SÉRIE CANVax -www.canvax.ca/fr de résistance que lorsqu'on la présentait comme moyen de prévention des infections transmissibles sexuellement (22).2.…”

unclassified

Optimisation du matériel de communication pour vaincre l’hésitation à la vaccination

Dubé¹,

Gagnon²,

Vivion³

2020

RMTC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

L'hésitation à la vaccination (soit la réticence à accepter les vaccins recommandés) est un problème complexe qui complique la communication des risques pour les autorités sanitaires publiques et les cliniciens. Des études démontrent que fournir trop de données probantes sur l'innocuité et l'efficacité des vaccins aux personnes hésitantes à la vaccination ne permet pas de diminuer les croyances et craintes associées à l'hésitation. Le présent document a pour objectif de décrire les bonnes pratiques en matière d'élaboration de matériel de communication visant à contrer l'hésitation à la vaccination. Nous avons évalué un échantillon de matériel de communication sur la vaccination utilisé au Canada en s'appuyant sur les recommandations d'un comité d'experts sur l'efficacité de la communication des risques pour les produits de santé du Conseil des académies canadiennes (2015). Plusieurs produits de communication actuels pourraient être améliorés si on se conformait aux pratiques d'excellence en matière de communication des risques fondées sur des données probantes. Nous avons désigné cinq pratiques d'excellence. Premièrement, déterminer le public cible et établir la confiance. Deuxièmement, fournir de l'information tant sur les risques que les avantages de la vaccination, puisque la plupart des gens souhaitent obtenir des renseignements nuancés. Troisièmement, présenter les faits avant de parler des mythes. Quatrièmement, utiliser des supports visuels. Cinquièmement, tester le matériel de communication avant le lancement. Mettre ces pratiques d'excellence en oeuvre avec les produits de communication actuels ou à venir aidera les vaccinateurs (dont les médecins, infirmiers praticiens, pharmaciens et professionnels de la santé publique) à créer du matériel de communication sensible aux moyens complexes que les personnes utilisent pour traiter et valoriser l'information et, par conséquent, plus susceptible d'optimiser l'adoption des vaccins au sein de leur collectivité.

show abstract

Addressing Parents’ Vaccine Concerns: A Randomized Trial of a Social Media Intervention

Cited by 131 publications

References 46 publications

Factors affecting the vaccination choices of pregnant women for their children: a systematic review of the literature

Factors affecting the vaccination choices of pregnant women for their children: a systematic review of the literature

Optimizing communication material to address vaccine hesitancy

Optimisation du matériel de communication pour vaincre l’hésitation à la vaccination

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About