2021
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0002122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing Legal and Contractual Matters in Construction Using Natural Language Processing: A Critical Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A contract can only be managed properly if the consensus and commonality in the meaning of its provisions are achieved by contracting parties with incompatible interests and complete contract terms (Cheung and Pang, 2013). Linguistic issues along with the biased provisions modified by the clients would make the contract incomplete, threatening parties to understand their obligations (Hassan et al, 2021). All these facts emphasize the need for improvements in contracts to ensure that its provisions, obligations and requirements are comprehensive, clear, complete and unambiguous (Wang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A contract can only be managed properly if the consensus and commonality in the meaning of its provisions are achieved by contracting parties with incompatible interests and complete contract terms (Cheung and Pang, 2013). Linguistic issues along with the biased provisions modified by the clients would make the contract incomplete, threatening parties to understand their obligations (Hassan et al, 2021). All these facts emphasize the need for improvements in contracts to ensure that its provisions, obligations and requirements are comprehensive, clear, complete and unambiguous (Wang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validation and evaluation of the method will most likely reveal opportunities for improvements. It is also expected that the forthcoming comparison of the method with knowledge extraction methods recently proposed for the construction engineering domain (Hassan et al 2021;Le, 2020, 2022;Moon et al 2022) will yield optimization options. Several opportunities for improvements that are worth further investigation have already been identified in the present state of the research project.…”
Section: Forthcoming Methods Evaluation and Future Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent research studies advanced NLP methods and Machine Learning have been applied to extract specific knowledge items from text documents of the construction domain, such as contractual risk clauses (Moon et al 2022), requirements (Hassan andLe, 2020), and legal and contractual matters (Hassan et al 2021). The results of these studies may offer promising research avenues for the computerbased relevance assessment of environmental regulations targeted in this work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topic modeling algorithms like Natural Language Processing (NLP)-based Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) can be employed to meet the objectives of this study. Such NLP-based tools have been used widely in the construction management research domain [ 26 ]. LDA, in particular, is widely used in several domains as a tool for topic modeling [ 27 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%