2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05983-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing human-tiger conflict using socio-ecological information on tolerance and risk

Abstract: Tigers are critically endangered due to deforestation and persecution. Yet in places, Sumatran tigers (Panthera tigris sumatrae) continue to coexist with people, offering insights for managing wildlife elsewhere. Here, we couple spatial models of encounter risk with information on tolerance from 2386 Sumatrans to reveal drivers of human–tiger conflict. Risk of encountering tigers was greater around populated villages that neighboured forest or rivers connecting tiger habitat; geographic profiles refined these … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together these results tend to demonstrate the importance of positive interactions for improved coexistence with large carnivores. As such results are often context‐specific, they would benefit from cross‐cultural comparisons, to understand how exposure to, experiences with and attitudes toward large carnivores relate to each other in different cultural contexts (Struebig et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Together these results tend to demonstrate the importance of positive interactions for improved coexistence with large carnivores. As such results are often context‐specific, they would benefit from cross‐cultural comparisons, to understand how exposure to, experiences with and attitudes toward large carnivores relate to each other in different cultural contexts (Struebig et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People's personal experiences, attitudes, and behavior are closely linked to one another, as demonstrated over the last decades within the theory of planned behavior (Ajzen, ) and subsequent frameworks (e.g., Yzer, ). Attitudes (e.g., tolerance toward wildlife) are mental processes involving affective components (e.g., emotions) and cognitive components (e.g., values, beliefs), which can, together with social norms and individual control over a situation, affect behavioral intentions and actions (Struebig et al, ). Personal experiences with a specific object often generate more stable attitudes toward this object, whereas people without direct experience will be more prone to radical changes in attitudes (Browne‐Nuñez, Treves, MacFarland, Voyles, & Turng, ; Doll & Ajzen, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire that we used adopted socio-ecological methods [12], but in this paper we only analyzed 2 predictors to measure respondent's perception on the tiger, tolerance and norms. We only use one question per predictor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 Socio-ecological assessments go one step further, by combining information from relevant stakeholders, obtained through qualitative or quantitative methods from the social sciences, with information about the ecology, distribution and population dynamics of target species 16 . Ecological information can also be spatially explicit, as most ecological processes incorporate a geographical dimension 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%