Addressing geographic access barriers to emergency care services: a national ecologic study of hospitals in Brazil

Abstract

BackgroundUnequal distribution of emergency care services is a critical barrier to be overcome to assure access to emergency and surgical care. Considering this context it was objective of the present work analyze geographic access barriers to emergency care services in Brazil. A secondary aim of the study is to define possible roles to be assumed by small hospitals in the Brazilian healthcare network to overcome geographic access challenges.MethodsThe present work can be classified as a cross-sectional ecological study. To carry out the present study, data of all 5843 Brazilian hospitals were categorized among high complexity centers and small hospitals. The geographical access barriers were identified through the use of two-step floating catchment area method. Once concluded the previous step an evaluation using the Getis-Ord-Gi method was performed to identify spatial clusters of municipalities with limited access to high complexity centers but well covered by well-equipped small hospitals.ResultsThe analysis of accessibility index of high complexity centers highlighted large portions of the country with nearly zero hospital beds by inhabitant. In contrast, it was possible observe a group of 1595 municipalities with high accessibility to small hospitals, simultaneously with a low coverage of high complexity centers. Among the 1595 municipalities with good accessibility to small hospitals, 74% (1183) were covered by small hospitals with at least 60% of minimum emergency service requirements. The spatial clusters analysis aggregated 589 municipalities with high values related to minimum emergency service requirements. Small hospitals in these 589 cities could promote the equity in access to emergency services benefiting more than eight million people.ConclusionsThere is a spatial disequilibrium within the country with prominent gaps in the health care network for emergency services. Taking this challenge into consideration, small hospitals could be a possible solution and foster equity in access to emergency and surgical care. However more investments in are necessary to improve small hospitals capabilities to fill this gap.

Comparing public and private emergency departments in China: Early evidence from a national healthcare quality survey

“…10 To the best of our knowledge, this is the first national study using data from 31 provinces reporting private ED status in mainland China. Hospitals included in this study were characteristically distinct from previous studies in highincome settings 12,13 or comparatively in studies from other Asian countries. 14 We identified and reported several important findings and trends that need to be addressed for healthcare planning and future policies.…”

“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the first national study using data from 31 provinces reporting private ED status in mainland China. Hospitals included in this study were characteristically distinct from previous studies in high‐income settings or comparatively in studies from other Asian countries …”

Methodology for building a geographical accessibility health index throughout metropolitan France

“…However, since this measure is not very intuitive in comparison to a density or a strict distance and does not take the demand on the supply itself into account, variations of these models have been proposed. Some of them include the demand for supply (2SFCA) [5][6][7][8][9][10], while others incorporate the diversity of transportation modes [11,12], travel time considerations using the "enhanced two-step floating catchment area" model or the E2SFCA model [13], and competition between suppliers (3SFCA) [14]. The Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (2SFCA) method has been used and improved in Australia [15,16], in Colombia [17], in France to construct the notion of localized potential accessibility (LPA) [18,19].…”

Brazil Health Care System preparation against COVID-19

“…Due to the COVID-19 consequences, the scenario faced by low and medium income countries is even more staggering (7). The historic challenges regarding an insufficient number of health professionals, iniquities in distribution of human resources (11), low accessibility to emergency care services (ECS) (12) and economic issues creates additional pressures to be addressed, aiming is to achieve an adequate COVID-19 response.…”