2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-020-00338-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing free fatty acid receptor 1 (FFAR1) activation using supervised molecular dynamics

Abstract: This document is the author's post-print version, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer-review process. Some differences between the published version and this version may remain and you are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The supervised molecular dynamics (SuMD) is an adaptive sampling method for speeding up the simulation of binding , and unbinding processes. , In the simplest SuMD implementation, sampling is gained without the introduction of any energetic bias, by applying a tabu-like algorithm to monitor the distance between the centers of mass (or the geometrical centers) of the ligand and the predicted binding site or the receptor. However, the supervision of a second metric of the system can be considered .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The supervised molecular dynamics (SuMD) is an adaptive sampling method for speeding up the simulation of binding , and unbinding processes. , In the simplest SuMD implementation, sampling is gained without the introduction of any energetic bias, by applying a tabu-like algorithm to monitor the distance between the centers of mass (or the geometrical centers) of the ligand and the predicted binding site or the receptor. However, the supervision of a second metric of the system can be considered .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the supervision of a second metric of the system can be considered. 44 A series of short unbiased MD simulations are performed, and after each simulation, the distances (collected at regular time intervals) are fitted to a linear function. If the resulting slope is negative (for binding) or positive (for unbinding), the next simulation step starts from the last set of coordinates and velocities produced; otherwise, the simulation is restarted by randomly assigning the atomic velocities.…”
Section: Generation Of Mutantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first SuMD implementation ( Sabbadin and Moro, 2014 ; Cuzzolin et al, 2016 ), sampling is gained without the introduction of any energetic bias, by applying a tabu–like algorithm to monitor the distance between the centers of mass (or the geometrical centers) of the ligand and the predicted binding site or the receptor. However, the supervision of a second metric of the system can be considered ( Atanasio et al, 2020 ). A series of short unbiased MD simulations are performed, and, after each simulation, the distances (collected at regular time intervals) are fitted to a linear function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supervised molecular dynamics (SuMD) is an adaptive sampling method for speeding up the simulation of binding [ 37 , 39 ] and unbinding processes [ 38 , 60 ]. Sampling is gained without the introduction of any energetic bias, by applying a tabu–like algorithm to monitor the distance between the centers of mass (or the geometrical centers) of the ligand and the predicted binding site or the receptor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling is gained without the introduction of any energetic bias, by applying a tabu–like algorithm to monitor the distance between the centers of mass (or the geometrical centers) of the ligand and the predicted binding site or the receptor. However, the supervision of a second metric of the system can be considered [ 60 ]. A series of short unbiased MD simulations are performed, and after each simulation, the distances (collected at regular time intervals) are fitted to a linear function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%