The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation 2011
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511921674.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing epistemic incongruence in question–answer sequences through the 
use of epistemic adverbs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The practices of the SBSS are contrasted to the caller's situation and the caller's experiences are generalized by using the particle ''ju'' (Line 173) (see Heinemannn et al, 2011). The call-taker responds with minimal tokens in overlap (Lines 177 and 180).…”
Section: Shift Devices Accounts and The Acceptance Of A Complainablmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practices of the SBSS are contrasted to the caller's situation and the caller's experiences are generalized by using the particle ''ju'' (Line 173) (see Heinemannn et al, 2011). The call-taker responds with minimal tokens in overlap (Lines 177 and 180).…”
Section: Shift Devices Accounts and The Acceptance Of A Complainablmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ancillary questions and orientation towards outcome and progression are all too easily derived from, perhaps even facilitated by, the conventional consultation format, which GPs are trained to master and observe. However, the analytic pinpointing of authentic and recognisable instances of such resources as has been presented above, can therefore serve as a means to raising GPs' awareness of particular int- However, the frequently used modal particle "jo" which indicates an expectation that the proposition in which it is embedded is shared knowledge (Heinemann, Lindström & Steensig 2011) has no verbatim translation in English, and therefore has been rendered as #PRT# in the English glossing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The student does not claim that he does exactly what the teacher says, but that he ''thinks'' that he does the same. Similarly, the modal particle ''ju,'' which in some contexts can be used to claim that some knowledge or understanding is shared (Heinemann, Lindström, and Steensig 2011), is used here analogously to the student's use of ''så'': it makes relevant the teacher's assessment of the understanding-or, perhaps, misunderstanding-exhibited in and through the student's claim (cf. Hindmarsh, Reynolds, and Dunne 2011).…”
Section: Fragmentmentioning
confidence: 99%