2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing ecosystem services from plan to project to further tiering in impact assessment: Lessons from highway planning in São Paulo, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is essential to establish an S&D relationship between ESs and human benefits [ 62 ]. Incorporating the assessment of ESs S&D into the construction of NRs as a basis for policy implementation can ensure the effectiveness of policy implementation [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is essential to establish an S&D relationship between ESs and human benefits [ 62 ]. Incorporating the assessment of ESs S&D into the construction of NRs as a basis for policy implementation can ensure the effectiveness of policy implementation [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on landuse changes and their impact on ESs values and tradeoffs are crucial and highly relevant to policy-making [22], ESs management [23], and future sustainable development [24]. These studies play a significant role in diverse ecosystems such as forest, wetland, urban areas, and coastal areas [25][26][27][28]. The requirements for ecological protection policies and governance measures in different functional zones with NRs differ from landuse objectives, resulting in various land-use scenarios, simulated based on the implementation requirements of conservation measures, and are critical for assessing the spatial decision-making impacts through evaluating changes in ESs supply and trade-offs relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has demonstrated how including ESs has the potential to improve traditional IAs and deal with some of its shortcomings [1][2][3][4][5]. One of the main critiques is that the added value for human wellbeing of avoiding environmental impacts is often not clear [6][7][8][9], reducing their weight in the decision-making process. ESs are directly expressed in terms of gains for human wellbeing, making the benefits for stakeholders more tangible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its holistic character supports the inclusion of indirect effects and effects resulting from tradeoffs and synergies among different sectors. It is crucial, herein, to consider not only changes in structural properties but also to evaluate how these affect ecosystem processes [12] and human beneficiaries [4,9,11]. Thus, ESs reflect the functioning of ecosystems as well as the prosperity of human societies [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation