Addressing Crime, Violence, and Other Determinants of Health through Community‐Based Participatory Research and Implementation Science

Stalker, Katie Cotter; Brown, Mary Ellen; Evans, Caroline B. R.; Hibdon, Julie; Telep, Cody W.

doi:10.1002/ajcp.12438

Cited by 19 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 28 publications

(31 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…2017 ) partnered with low-income neighborhood residents to plan and plant a neighborhood garden to enhance social cohesion and increase safety in the neighborhood. Similar CBPR studies have been conducted in multiple other populations ( Stalker et al. 2020 ; Bang et al.…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 58%

“…Academic investigators (Bateman et al 2017) partnered with low-income neighborhood residents to plan and plant a neighborhood garden to enhance social cohesion and increase safety in the neighborhood. Similar CBPR studies have been conducted in multiple other populations (Stalker et al 2020;Bang et al 2014). The collaborative approach of CPBR is a strength, which ensures that the community's voice and preferences are embedded in the structure of the research process (Hoover et al 2015;Viswanathan et al 2004).…”

Section: Emerging Research Opportunitiesmentioning

confidence: 93%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Interplay of Environmental Exposures and Mental Health: Setting an Agenda

Reuben

Manczak

Cabrera

et al. 2022

Environ Health Perspect

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: To date, health-effects research on environmental stressors has rarely focused on behavioral and mental health outcomes. That lack of research is beginning to change. Science and policy experts in the environmental and behavioral health sciences are coming together to explore converging evidence on the relationship—harmful or beneficial—between environmental factors and mental health. Objectives: To organize evidence and catalyze new findings, the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) hosted a workshop 2–3 February 2021 on the interplay of environmental exposures and mental health outcomes. Methods: This commentary provides a nonsystematic, expert-guided conceptual review and interdisciplinary perspective on the convergence of environmental and mental health, drawing from hypotheses, findings, and research gaps presented and discussed at the workshop. Featured is an overview of what is known about the intersection of the environment and mental health, focusing on the effects of neurotoxic pollutants, threats related to climate change, and the importance of health promoting environments, such as urban green spaces. Discussion: We describe what can be gained by bridging environmental and psychological research disciplines and present a synthesis of what is needed to advance interdisciplinary investigations. We also consider the implications of the current evidence for a ) foundational knowledge of the etiology of mental health and illness, b ) toxicant policy and regulation, c ) definitions of climate adaptation and community resilience, d ) interventions targeting marginalized communities, and e ) the future of research training and funding. We include a call to action for environmental and mental health researchers, focusing on the environmental contributions to mental health to unlock primary prevention strategies at the population level and open equitable paths for preventing mental disorders and achieving optimal mental health for all. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP9889

show abstract

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 58%

Section: Emerging Research Opportunitiesmentioning

confidence: 93%

The Interplay of Environmental Exposures and Mental Health: Setting an Agenda

Reuben

Manczak

Cabrera

et al. 2022

Environ Health Perspect

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Collectively, these articles illustrate diverse CBPR approaches to understanding and promoting health equity. These include Stalker, Brown, Evans, Hibdon, and Telep (2020) work applying CBPR to violence prevention; Foell et al (2020) CBPR work on a resident led neighborhood development effort to promote health; and participation needs and health services to older adults (see Turcotte, Carrier, & Levasseur, 2020). These articles provide excellent examples of the application of these approaches in a variety of socio‐cultural contexts.…”

Section: Articles Of the Special Issuementioning

confidence: 99%

Applying Community‐Based Participatory Approaches to Addressing Health Disparities and Promoting Health Equity

Suárez-Balcázar

Francisco

Chávez

2020

American J of Comm Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This special issue highlights work that contributes to our understanding of health disparities and community‐based participatory research (CBPR) approaches to promoting health equity across diverse populations and issues that matter to communities. We take on a global perspective, and thus, various efforts across international contexts are illustrated. Articles elucidate a variety of CBPR approaches designed to empower and build capacity among individuals and communities in order to seek changes at the level of community practices, programs, and systems. These articles span across diverse populations—children, youth, and families; adults and older adults; immigrants; refugees; Black people; Latinx people; Native Americans/Indigenous people, the Roma community; Muslim women, and women with disabilities—experiencing inequities of interest to community psychologists and other researchers and practitioners.

show abstract

“…The present study demonstrates that a participatory action research approach supported by theoretical approaches used in implementation sciences is a promising method for implementing e-health innovations in multidisciplinary rehabilitation settings. This combined approach has been used successfully in other research areas as well [ 26 , 27 ], but it had not yet been used for implementing an e-health innovation in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation setting. In this study, the approach resulted in mainly positive implementation outcomes, a good technology acceptance and fairly good user experiences with the e-health innovation ALS H&C. The implementation of ALS H&C was sustainable in seven out of nine rehabilitation settings that completed the implementation process.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Others have argued that the combination of implementation science and action research approaches is a promising method for integrating research findings into practice in a sustainable way [ 23 , 25 ]. The combination of participatory action research and implementation science has been used successfully before [ 26 , 27 ]. To our knowledge, this approach has not yet been used for implementing an e-health innovation in a multidisciplinary setting.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the nation-wide implementation of ALS home monitoring & coaching: an e-health innovation for personalized care for patients with motor neuron disease

Dontje

Reenen²,

Wijk³

et al. 2022

BMC Health Serv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background To improve the care for patients with motor neuron disease an e-health innovation for continuous monitoring of disease progression and patients’ well-being (ALS H&C) was implemented in 10 multidisciplinary rehabilitation settings. The first aim was to evaluate the implementation of ALS H&C by assessing several implementation outcomes, technology acceptance and usability of the innovation according to the end users. The secondary aim was to explore differences in these outcomes between the teams with sustainable and unsustainable implementation. Methods The chosen implementation strategy was a combination of the implementation process model by Grol & Wensing and a participatory action research approach. In three meetings with multidisciplinary project groups the innovation was introduced, the expected barriers/facilitators identified, and action plans to resolve each barrier developed. After a 3-month pilot phase, patients and their healthcare providers were asked to complete an online evaluation survey to assess implementation outcomes, based on Proctor’s evaluation framework (i.e., acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, sustainability). Telemedicine technology acceptance was assessed according the technology acceptance model of Chau, and user experiences with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Implementation outcomes of teams with sustainable implementation (continuation after completion of the pilot phase) and unsustainable implementation (discontinuation after the pilot phase) were compared. Results The implementation outcomes from the patients’ perspective (N = 71) were positive; they found ALS H&C to be an acceptable and feasible care concept. Patients’ technology acceptance was high, with positive attitudes towards ALS H&C, and positive views on perceived technology control, usefulness, and ease of use. Patients rated their satisfaction with the (web) app on a scale from 1 (not satisfied at all) to 10 (very satisfied) with a 7.0 (median; IQR 1.0). Healthcare providers (N = 76) also found ALS H&C acceptable and appropriate as well, but were less positive about the feasibility and usability of ALS H&C (mean SUS 58.8 [SD 11.3]). ALS H&C has largely been implemented as intended and the implementation was sustainable in 7 teams. Teams who discontinued ALS H&C after the pilot phase (N = 2) had more fidelity issues. Conclusions A participatory action research approach supported by theoretical approaches used in implementation science led to a sustainable implementation of ALS H&C in 7 of the participating teams. To improve implementation success, additional implementation strategies to increase feasibility, usability and fidelity are necessary. Trial registration Trial NL8542 registered at Netherlands Trial Register (trialregister.nl) on 15th April 2020.

show abstract

Addressing Crime, Violence, and Other Determinants of Health through Community‐Based Participatory Research and Implementation Science

Cited by 19 publications

References 28 publications

The Interplay of Environmental Exposures and Mental Health: Setting an Agenda

The Interplay of Environmental Exposures and Mental Health: Setting an Agenda

Applying Community‐Based Participatory Approaches to Addressing Health Disparities and Promoting Health Equity

Evaluation of the nation-wide implementation of ALS home monitoring & coaching: an e-health innovation for personalized care for patients with motor neuron disease

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About