2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12887-016-0745-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing asthma and obesity in children with community health workers: proof-of-concept intervention development

Abstract: BackgroundThe objective of this study was to design and test the feasibility and impact of a community health worker (CHW) intervention for comorbid asthma and obesity.MethodsUsing a proof of concept study design, we collected pre/post outcomes from a single intervention cohort of urban low-income in a single community area. A community-based participatory research approach was employed. Forty-six children and their caregivers were recruited. Children were 5–12 years old with physician-diagnosed asthma and bod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most interventions were delivered in the United States, with the exception of two studies that were based in Auckland, New Zealand and Melbourne, Australia . Three of the American studies were based in California , and three were based in New England ; most American studies were based in urban settings . Sample sizes varied, ranging from 33 to 3,765 (mean 792, SD 72; 9 with samples <1,000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Most interventions were delivered in the United States, with the exception of two studies that were based in Auckland, New Zealand and Melbourne, Australia . Three of the American studies were based in California , and three were based in New England ; most American studies were based in urban settings . Sample sizes varied, ranging from 33 to 3,765 (mean 792, SD 72; 9 with samples <1,000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample sizes varied, ranging from 33 to 3,765 (mean 792, SD 72; 9 with samples <1,000). Target ages included children from throughout the developmental spectrum; sample ages ranged from 24 months (mothers recruited during pregnancy) , young children (3–5 years) , school age (5–12 years) , to adolescents . No intervention was gender‐specific.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations