“…Such complex porous lattices can be manufactured via 3D additive manufacturing that can effectively control the size, shape, distribution, and interconnectivity of pores and struts. , Lattice structures are widely categorized into two types: strut- and surface-based structures. Among surface-based lattices, the triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) lattice has zero-mean curvature at each local location on the surface. , Given their potential for application as interior structures of additively made bone implants, TPMS scaffolds have gained a lot of attention in the past decade. , AM has expanded the design freedom, porosity control, and precision of these structures, overcoming numerous limits encountered during the fabrication of conventional lattice structures. , The implicit nature of TPMS-based implants allowed for exactly controlled surface curvatures through geometric alteration, superior mechanical properties, longer fatigue life, and a closer likeness to bone internal structures. , As a result, various physical factors, including surface-to-volume ratio, pore size, elastic properties, and fluid behaviors, become adjustable. , Furthermore, TPMS architectures enabled the development of bone implants that were both mechanically and physiologically optimal. TPMS structures have demonstrated better performance than strut-based structures. , Melchels et al compared cell seedability between the gyroid lattice and scaffolds with random pore topologies via an in vitro investigation.…”