2008
DOI: 10.1017/s030500410700093x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additive structures in sumsets

Abstract: Suppose that A is a subset of the integers {1,...,N} of density a. We provide a new proof of a result of Green which shows that A+A contains an arithmetic progression of length exp(ca(log N)^{1/2}) for some absolute c>0. Furthermore we improve the length of progression guaranteed in higher sumsets; for example we show that A+A+A contains a progression of length roughly N^{ca} improving on the previous best of N^{ca^{2+\epsilon}}.Comment: 28 pp. Corrected typos. Updated references

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In [San08] the result of Green and Tao is refined with Chang's theorem. One can use the same techniques to refine Proposition 7.2 with Theorem 2.2, our A(G)-analogue of Chang's theorem; doing so gives the following.…”
Section: A Structural Results For the Local Fourier Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [San08] the result of Green and Tao is refined with Chang's theorem. One can use the same techniques to refine Proposition 7.2 with Theorem 2.2, our A(G)-analogue of Chang's theorem; doing so gives the following.…”
Section: A Structural Results For the Local Fourier Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/fms.2016.2 focus on the small density case: when α is large some prior results can offer better bounds; for example, for F n 2 Sanders showed in [21] that 2A contains 1 − of an affine subspace of codimension at most Cα −2 log(1/ ), and codimension at most Cα −1 log(1/ ) in [22]. However, it is far from clear where the truth lies for these results -not only in terms of the exponents on the logarithms but also in the qualitative differences between 3A and 4A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See for example [7,15,21,22] for more background. From the perspective of the present paper it is illuminating to consider what is known in this setting for 2A, 3A and 4A, for which the best bounds known for large densities are all due to Sanders.…”
Section: Density Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…for some absolute constant c > 0. This bound was improved by Green [18] using a different Fourier-analytic argument to the best bound that is currently known for highdensity sets, increasing the exponent 1/3 above to 1/2; a similar bound has since also been established by Sanders [36] using another Fourier-analytic technique. By contrast, our result yields somewhat shorter arithmetic progressions for high-density sets (where α and β are thought of as not depending on N) but is also able to deal with sets that are much smaller than previously possible.…”
Section: Proposition 13 (Lmentioning
confidence: 95%