2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additive models and robust aggregation for GEFCom2014 probabilistic electric load and electricity price forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
155
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
155
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Like in [12,18,[25][26][27]30], the modeling is implemented separately across the hours, leading to 24 sets of parameters for each day the forecasting exercise is performed. As Ziel [18] notes, when we compare the forecasting performance of relatively simple models implemented separately across the hours and jointly for all hours (like in [9,[34][35][36]), the latter generally performs better for the first half of the day, whereas the former are better in the second half of the day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like in [12,18,[25][26][27]30], the modeling is implemented separately across the hours, leading to 24 sets of parameters for each day the forecasting exercise is performed. As Ziel [18] notes, when we compare the forecasting performance of relatively simple models implemented separately across the hours and jointly for all hours (like in [9,[34][35][36]), the latter generally performs better for the first half of the day, whereas the former are better in the second half of the day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• nine variants of three parsimonious autoregressive model structures with exogenous variables (ARX): one originally proposed by Misiorek et al [19] and later used in a number of EPF studies [13,18,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], one which evolved from it during the successful participation of TEAM POLAND in the Global Energy Forecasting Competition 2014 (GEFCom2014; see [28][29][30]) and an extension of the former, which creates a stronger link with yesterday's prices and additionally considers a second exogenous variable (zonal load or wind power), • three two-year long, hourly resolution test periods from three distinct power markets (GEFCom2014, Nord Pool and the U.K.), • nine variants of five classes of selection and shrinkage procedures: single-step elimination of insignificant predictors (without or with constraints), stepwise regression (with forward selection or backward elimination), ridge regression, lasso and three elastic nets (with α = 0.25, 0.5 or 0.75), • model validation in terms of the robust weekly-weighted mean absolute error (WMAE; see [1]) and the Diebold-Mariano (DM; see [31]) test and draw statistically-significant conclusions of high practical value. The remainder of the paper is structured as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these r packages are 'forecastHybrid' (Shaub and Ellis, 2017) and 'opera' (Gaillard and Goude, 2016). The 'opera' r package was used in this study.…”
Section: Forecast Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature focuses mainly on forecasting short-term electricity demand (Gaillard et al, 2016;Fasiolo et al, 2017). Additive quantile regression models for forecasting both short-term probabilistic load and electricity prices for the Global Energy Forecasting Competition of 2014 (GEFCom2014) were discussed in Gaillard et al (2016). The proposed new methodology of Gaillard et al (2016) ranked first in both tracks of the competition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation