Additive manufacturing for biomedical applications: a review on classification, energy consumption, and its appreciable role since COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

The exponential rise of healthcare problems like human aging and road traffic accidents have developed an intrinsic challenge to biomedical sectors concerning the arrangement of patient-specific biomedical products. The additively manufactured implants and scaffolds have captured global attention over the last two decades concerning their printing quality and ease of manufacturing. However, the inherent challenges associated with additive manufacturing (AM) technologies, namely process selection, level of complexity, printing speed, resolution, biomaterial choice, and consumed energy, still pose several limitations on their use. Recently, the whole world has faced severe supply chain disruptions of personal protective equipment and basic medical facilities due to a respiratory disease known as the coronavirus (COVID-19). In this regard, local and global AM manufacturers have printed biomedical products to level the supply–demand equation. The potential of AM technologies for biomedical applications before, during, and post-COVID-19 pandemic alongwith its relation to the industry 4.0 (I4.0) concept is discussed herein. Moreover, additive manufacturing technologies are studied in this work concerning their working principle, classification, materials, processing variables, output responses, merits, challenges, and biomedical applications. Different factors affecting the sustainable performance in AM for biomedical applications are discussed with more focus on the comparative examination of consumed energy to determine which process is more sustainable. The recent advancements in the field like 4D printing and 5D printing are useful for the successful implementation of I4.0 to combat any future pandemic scenario. The potential of hybrid printing, multi-materials printing, and printing with smart materials, has been identified as hot research areas to produce scaffolds and implants in regenerative medicine, tissue engineering, and orthopedic implants.

Powder Bed Fusion 3D Printing in Precision Manufacturing for Biomedical Applications: A Comprehensive Review

“…Precision manufacturing is considered in the biomedical field owing to the requirements of durability and a high level of precision. Several researchers are currently engaged in biomedical research endeavors aimed at the precise additive manufacturing of functional components within the human body [40,41]. The implementation of this approach guarantees the manufacturing of accurate medical equipment, diagnostics, and individualized treatments, resulting in enhanced patient outcomes, greater diagnostic capabilities, and compliance with rigorous regulatory requirements.…”

Titanium Alloy Implants with Lattice Structures for Mandibular Reconstruction

“…Computer models can be utilized to design implant devices that follow the exact contour and geometry of the original bone structure. Consequently, patient-specific orthopaedic implant models can be produced using additive manufacturing (AM) techniques [ 42 , 99 , 100 ]. Moreover, computer models can be exported into finite element analysis (FEA) programs to perform mechanical loading simulations and prototyping [ 21 , 23 , 27 , 92 , 101 ].…”

“…AM, also known as 3D printing, has seen an increase in use by different industries in the past few years, with a global market reaching up to about USD 30 billion in 2022, [ 100 ]. AM builds constructs layer by layer.…”

SMART Materials for Biomedical Applications: Advancements and Challenges

“…The capacity to adapt is of great significance in the field of cancer treatment, as there exists a considerable range of tumour features and responses to treatments among individuals. Multifunctional materials have the potential to enhance therapeutic efficacy and minimise unwanted effects by optimising treatment doses, timing, and combinations through real-time feedback [22]. The potential to expedite drug development, as shown in fig.…”