2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additive effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors and amphetamine on histone H4 acetylation, cAMP responsive element binding protein phosphorylation and ΔFosB expression in the striatum and locomotor sensitization in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ac-H3 K9/14 inhibiteurs a conduit à : (1) augmenter la consommation de cocaïne pendant la phase de maintenance de l'autoadministration [48] ; (2) accroître la sensibilisation comportementale et la préférence de place induites par la morphine [49] ; (3) potentialiser la sensibilisation comportementale et l'activité locomotrice induites par l'amphétamine [50] ; et (4) augmenter l'activation locomotrice produite par la cocaïne [36,39]. [36].…”
Section: Mbd1unclassified
“…Ac-H3 K9/14 inhibiteurs a conduit à : (1) augmenter la consommation de cocaïne pendant la phase de maintenance de l'autoadministration [48] ; (2) accroître la sensibilisation comportementale et la préférence de place induites par la morphine [49] ; (3) potentialiser la sensibilisation comportementale et l'activité locomotrice induites par l'amphétamine [50] ; et (4) augmenter l'activation locomotrice produite par la cocaïne [36,39]. [36].…”
Section: Mbd1unclassified
“…Behavioral assays have been developed in a number of animal models to measure many of the known physiological manifestations associated with drug addiction, including locomotor sensitization (Benwell & Balfour, 1992;Kalivas & Stewart, 1991), conditioned place preference (CPP; Tzschentke, 1998), self-administration (Stairs, Neugebauer, & Bardo, 2010), and withdrawal (André, Gulick, Portugal, & Gould, 2008). Behavioral assays define changes induced by drug exposure and enable differential molecular analysis of the resulting transcriptional (i.e., gene expression) and epigenetic states (Kane, Konu, Ma, & Li, 2004;Kumar et al, 2005;Levine et al, 2005;Nestler, 2008;Renthal et al, 2007;Romieu et al, 2008;Shen et al, 2008). As the reinforcing properties of addictive drugs are highly conserved, behavioral assays have been adapted to zebrafish to study addiction to cocaine (Darland & Dowling, 2001), ethanol (Lockwood, Bjerke, Kobayashi, & Guo, 2004;Peng et al, 2009), amphetamines (Ninkovic & Bally-Cuif, 2006;Webb et al, 2009), and opiates (Bretaud et al, 2007;Lau, Bretaud, Huang, Lin, & Guo, 2006;Sanchez-Simon & Rodriguez, 2008).…”
Section: Drug Addiction and Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, new concepts have emerged about chromatin modification and gene regulation in dividing and non-dividing cells. Chromatinrelated modifications of gene expression patterns have been shown to be important for the long-lasting effects of psychostimulants on the brain (Kumar et al, 2005;BramiCherrier et al, 2005;Renthal et al, 2007;Renthal and Nestler, 2008;Shen et al, 2008;Stipanovich et al, 2008;Renthal et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%