2015
DOI: 10.1002/uog.14830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature and related correspondence. A plea to assess oranges only

Abstract: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 625-626 Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). CorrespondenceAdditional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature and related correspondence. A plea to assess oranges only.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our concordance is lower than the review average. However, heterogeneity of factors such as sample size, patient selection, operator expertise and gestation at MRI in the review's individual studies does make direct extrapolation of results problematic. Overall, though, our local results are broadly comparable with the international review, where (as in our setting) scans were performed by fetal medicine experts in referral centres, and MRI use in selected cases provided helpful additional information .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Our concordance is lower than the review average. However, heterogeneity of factors such as sample size, patient selection, operator expertise and gestation at MRI in the review's individual studies does make direct extrapolation of results problematic. Overall, though, our local results are broadly comparable with the international review, where (as in our setting) scans were performed by fetal medicine experts in referral centres, and MRI use in selected cases provided helpful additional information .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…We believe that these results represent a first attempt at separating apples from oranges. Until now, there has been a significant overestimation of the clinical usefulness of MRI in fetal brain anomalies, due to a worrying underperformance of what has been labelled ‘Level‐II’ ultrasound but which was apparently inferior even to screening level in some studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…[ 19 ] In alobar HPE, the diagnosis can be made by ultrasonography, but a fetal MRI can be requested by a neurosonographer for a second-level examination if deemed necessary to identify other cerebral anomalies. [ 20 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%