2011
DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0b013e318217ae2e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additional Benefit of F-18 FDG PET/CT in the Staging and Follow-up of Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma

Abstract: FDG PET/CT can be useful in staging and restaging pediatric RMS, especially for assessing lymph nodes and bone involvement, and for detecting unknown primary sites of RMS, with potential therapeutic strategy alteration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
38
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For staging purposes, the results of a prospective multicenter trial of 46 pediatric and adolescent patients indicated a marked added value of 18 F-FDG PET over conventional imaging for the detection of additional lesions and a relevant impact on therapy planning (40). Ricard et al (43) evaluated the additional benefit of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for staging and follow-up in 13 pediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma; they concluded that 18 F-FDG PET/CT was useful, especially for assessing lymph node and bone involvement and for cases in which the primary sites of rhabdomyosarcoma were unclear. By analogy, whole-body PET/MR may have great potential to become an integrated part of the diagnostic algorithm in the future (15).…”
Section: Soft-tissue Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For staging purposes, the results of a prospective multicenter trial of 46 pediatric and adolescent patients indicated a marked added value of 18 F-FDG PET over conventional imaging for the detection of additional lesions and a relevant impact on therapy planning (40). Ricard et al (43) evaluated the additional benefit of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for staging and follow-up in 13 pediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma; they concluded that 18 F-FDG PET/CT was useful, especially for assessing lymph node and bone involvement and for cases in which the primary sites of rhabdomyosarcoma were unclear. By analogy, whole-body PET/MR may have great potential to become an integrated part of the diagnostic algorithm in the future (15).…”
Section: Soft-tissue Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was recommended that bone scans be omitted if bone sarcomas are evaluated with 18 F-FDG PET (81). The appropriateness of this recommendation was confirmed by studies that evaluated rhabdomyosarcomas and bone sarcomas separately: for detection of bone metastases in rhabdomyosarcomas, 18 F-FDG PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 100%, compared with 66% for conventional imaging modalities, including radiography, CT, MR imaging (79), or bone scintigraphy alone (2,71). For detection of bone metastases in Ewing sarcomas, 18 F-FDG PET showed a sensitivity of 88%, compared with 37% for conventional imaging modalities (78).…”
Section: Initial Stagingmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Several studies have demonstrated improved sensitivities and specificities for 18 F-FDG PET/CT compared with all collective standard staging procedures, specifically for patients with lymphomas, sarcomas, and head and neck cancers (1)(2)(3)(4). However, exposure of children to radiation through 18 F-FDG PET/CT is of concern to the pediatric imaging community (5,6), and various low-dose approaches are being pursued (7)(8)(9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent prospective comparative study on soft-tissue sarcoma staging reported that 18 F-FDG PET is superior to conventional diagnostic imaging techniques (MRI of the tumor primary site, whole-body CT, and 99m Tc-methyl diphosphonate bone scintigraphy) for N-staging, with a sensitivity of 95% versus 25%, respectively (26). 18 F-FDG PET/CT was reported to change the N-stage in 4 of 13 rhabdomyosarcoma patients in a smaller series (21). Interestingly, a retrospective study on PET with the radiotracer 11 C-choline reported 100% accuracy for N-staging in softtissue sarcomas and an overall accuracy of 94% for TNM staging, versus 50% for conventional imaging modalities (27).…”
Section: Soft-tissue Sarcomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of additional PET data will not obviate definite histopathologic diagnosis by biopsy; thus, PET/MRI is not expected to be of additional use in the primary diagnosis of undetermined softtissue masses. But analogously to 18 F-FDG PET, there might be an indication for integrated whole-body PET/MRI in the diagnostic algorithm in cases of sarcoma in which the primary location is unknown (21).…”
Section: Soft-tissue Sarcomamentioning
confidence: 99%