2010
DOI: 10.4995/wrs.1996.293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addition of Probiotic to Feeds With Different Energy and Adf Content in Rabbits. 1. Effect on the Digestive Organs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results are consistent with the findings of Kermauner and Struklec (1996) observed that addition of probiotic Acid-Pack-4-way on the diet of rabbit increased (P≤0.05) the dressing percentage and carcass weight. Also, Fathi et al (2017) indicated that supplementation of dietary with probiotic compared to other dietary treatments resulted in a significantly higher percentage of dressing.…”
Section: Carcass Traitssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The present results are consistent with the findings of Kermauner and Struklec (1996) observed that addition of probiotic Acid-Pack-4-way on the diet of rabbit increased (P≤0.05) the dressing percentage and carcass weight. Also, Fathi et al (2017) indicated that supplementation of dietary with probiotic compared to other dietary treatments resulted in a significantly higher percentage of dressing.…”
Section: Carcass Traitssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, Maertens et al (1994) observed that caecal weight was higher in rabbits fed the Paciflor ® (Bacillus) diet. Additionally, Kermauner and Struklec (1996) noted that an effect of 0.5% probiotic Acid Pack 4 Way (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Streptococcus faecium) was only observed in the decreased proportion of stomach and increased proportion of caecum of gastrointestinal weight.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inversely with previous findings, Maertens et al (1994) observed that caecal weight was higher in rabbits fed the Paciflor ® (Bacillus) diet. Additionally, Kermauner and Struklec (1996) noted that an effect of 0.5% probiotic Acid Pack Way (L. acidophilus, and Streptococcus faecium) was only observed in the decreased proportion of stomach and increased proportion of caecum of gastrointestinal weight. Thus, the contradictory results in the literature could be explained by differences in experimental design concerning breeding conditions, breed of rabbit, weaning age, composition of diet and strain, dose and period of administration of microorganisms used, as well as the hygienic levels during the experimental period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%