2011
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.3523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addition of panitumumab to irinotecan: Results of PICCOLO, a randomized controlled trial in advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several retrospective studies also suggested the role of BRAF as a marker of resistance to the EGFR-directed therapy in patients with metastatic CRC who experienced progression on the first-line therapy [ 50 53 ]. Furthermore, recent prospective data from the PICCOLO trial consistently reported the dismal effect of panitumumab combined with irinotecan on patient with BRAF mutations in the subsequent lines setting of chemotherapy [ 54 ]. Based on these results, BRAF mutation is now suggested as a prognostic factor in patients with CRC, and current guideline recommends genotyping of the gene at diagnosis of stage IV disease.…”
Section: Egfr-targeted Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several retrospective studies also suggested the role of BRAF as a marker of resistance to the EGFR-directed therapy in patients with metastatic CRC who experienced progression on the first-line therapy [ 50 53 ]. Furthermore, recent prospective data from the PICCOLO trial consistently reported the dismal effect of panitumumab combined with irinotecan on patient with BRAF mutations in the subsequent lines setting of chemotherapy [ 54 ]. Based on these results, BRAF mutation is now suggested as a prognostic factor in patients with CRC, and current guideline recommends genotyping of the gene at diagnosis of stage IV disease.…”
Section: Egfr-targeted Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there is a paucity of evidence to warrant mutation testing in the clinical setting (Downward 2003). There is the suggestion of an association of NRAS mutations with a lower response to cetuximab and panitumumab from retrospective trial analyses (De Roock et al 2010), and this is supported by emerging data from the PICCOLO study (Seymour et al 2011a;De Mattos-Arruda et al 2011). …”
Section: Kras Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…An association has been seen between BRAF V600E mutations and resistance to cetuximab in chemorefractory mCRC (Laurent-Puig et al 2009), supported by randomized trial data of a lesser benefit from cetuximab in patients whose tumors harbored a BRAF V600E mutation (Bokemeyer et al 2011;Van Cutsem et al 2011b). Initial results from the PICCOLO study examining the value of panitumumab in combination with irinotecan chemotherapy have demonstrated that patients whose tumors have a BRAF mutation do not benefit from the addition of panitumumab and may in fact experience a detrimental effect (Seymour et al 2011a). …”
Section: Kras Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The randomized multicenter PICCOLO trial, which assessed the safety and efficacy of irinotecan plus P, did not meet its primary end point of improved OS [76]. Even if there are no data support switching to either C or P after failure of the drug and guidelines are against this practice at the last ASCO annual meeting have been reported results from a retrospective analysis conducted on 25 mCRC patients with failed C treatment and undergone treatment with P. This analysis showed minimal benefit of P in this setting of patients, but prospective studies are required to adopt this clinical practice [77].…”
Section: Anti-egfr Moabs Against Gi Cancersmentioning
confidence: 98%