2014
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addition of mesalazine for subclinical post‐surgical endoscopic recurrence of Crohn's disease despite preventive thiopurine therapy: A case–control study

Abstract: The addition of mesalazine seems to be of no benefit in patients with subclinical endoscopic recurrence while on thiopurine prevention. Moderate endoscopic postsurgical recurrence while on thiopurines may even revert with no additional therapy in some patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond the early postoperative management of CD, it is a fact that approximately half of these patients develop early mucosal lesions that put them at risk of clinical POR. Mesalazine has demonstrated a very limited efficacy in this setting ( 14 16 , 22 ). Thiopurines, although useful ( 14 ), are hampered by a high rate of intolerance and their slow active mechanism, and they may not be the most suitable option in patients with already existing clinical POR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the early postoperative management of CD, it is a fact that approximately half of these patients develop early mucosal lesions that put them at risk of clinical POR. Mesalazine has demonstrated a very limited efficacy in this setting ( 14 16 , 22 ). Thiopurines, although useful ( 14 ), are hampered by a high rate of intolerance and their slow active mechanism, and they may not be the most suitable option in patients with already existing clinical POR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, mesalazine-treated patients exhibited less frequent endoscopic improvement after one year compared to their AZA counterparts (RS reduction 8–34% vs. 36–63%, respectively). Furthermore, a small case-control study failed to demonstrate any benefit from the addition of mesalazine in patients with subclinical endoscopic recurrence who were already receiving thiopurine therapy [ 124 ].…”
Section: Medical Treatment Of Postoperative Recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%