2000
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0682(200008)2000:8<1795::aid-ejic1795>3.0.co;2-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addition and Coupling Reactions of Zirconocene Cation Complexes that Contain a Pendant η2-Formaldiminium Side Chain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table , the differences in bond distances between 1 and 2 are within 0.02 Å, which is consistent with the difference between Shannon's ionic radii of Zr(IV) and Hf(IV) . The Zr−C(13) distance of 2.237(6) Å is very close to the Zr−C(15) distance of 2.242(6) Å, which compare well with the 2.246(3) Å found in tol [NCN]Zr(CH 2 SiMe 3 ) 2 , 2.273(3) Å in ( η 5 -C 5 Me 5 ) 2 Zr[CH 2 N(Me)CH 2 N(Me)CH 2 ], and 2.272(7) Å in [( η 5 -C 5 H 5 ){ η 5 : σ : σ -(C 5 H 4 )C(Me) 2 N(Me) CH 2 }Zr(Bu t NC)][MeB(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ] 7a. The average Zr−cage atom distance of 2.544(6) Å is close to that of 2.564(5) Å found in ( η 5 -C 2 B 9 H 11 )Zr(NEt 2 ) 2 (HNEt 2 ) 5a.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Table , the differences in bond distances between 1 and 2 are within 0.02 Å, which is consistent with the difference between Shannon's ionic radii of Zr(IV) and Hf(IV) . The Zr−C(13) distance of 2.237(6) Å is very close to the Zr−C(15) distance of 2.242(6) Å, which compare well with the 2.246(3) Å found in tol [NCN]Zr(CH 2 SiMe 3 ) 2 , 2.273(3) Å in ( η 5 -C 5 Me 5 ) 2 Zr[CH 2 N(Me)CH 2 N(Me)CH 2 ], and 2.272(7) Å in [( η 5 -C 5 H 5 ){ η 5 : σ : σ -(C 5 H 4 )C(Me) 2 N(Me) CH 2 }Zr(Bu t NC)][MeB(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ] 7a. The average Zr−cage atom distance of 2.544(6) Å is close to that of 2.564(5) Å found in ( η 5 -C 2 B 9 H 11 )Zr(NEt 2 ) 2 (HNEt 2 ) 5a.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…But they may serve as the intermediates and subsequently eliminate a SiMe 4 molecule via the rupture of a C−H bond at one of the N-methyl groups to give the final products. Such an internal C−H activation is normally observed at methylzirconocene cations or [(C 5 Me 5 )(C 2 B 9 H 11 )]TiCH 3 , 1b,g rather than neutral metallocene alkyls. Both complexes 1 and 2 were fully characterized by various spectroscopic techniques and elemental analyses…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The 13 C NMR resonance of the Zr−CH 2 −N moiety is observed at 55.4 ppm, while the related 1 J CH coupling constant amounts to 150.3 Hz. This value is about 13 Hz larger than those observed for the N−CH 3 ( 1 J CH = 137.4 Hz) and N−CH 2 −R ( 1 J CH = 137.2 Hz) groups and is diagnostic of the heterocyclopropane character of the zirconaaziridinium framework. In analogy with η 2 -imine complexes of zirconium two extreme resonance structures may in principle contribute to the description of the iminium−Zr bond, but that involving the π coordination of the iminium double bond to a formally Zr(II) center is certainly less important due to the high π basicity of Zr(II) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%