Proceedings Second International Workshop on Digital and Computational Video
DOI: 10.1109/dcv.2001.929941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adding precision to airborne video with model based registration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second frame is translated or rotated to compensate the movement of the airborne platform itself, and then the two frames can be considered to be taken from a stationary platform. For frame registration, many onground processing methods were proposed for airborne videos (Angel et al, 2002b;Hirvonen et al, 2001;Shastry and Schowengerdt, 2005;Workum and Blask, 2001;Yuping and Medioni, 2007). These methods have high accuracy; however, they might not be suitable for on-board processing because of high computational complexity.…”
Section: Frame Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second frame is translated or rotated to compensate the movement of the airborne platform itself, and then the two frames can be considered to be taken from a stationary platform. For frame registration, many onground processing methods were proposed for airborne videos (Angel et al, 2002b;Hirvonen et al, 2001;Shastry and Schowengerdt, 2005;Workum and Blask, 2001;Yuping and Medioni, 2007). These methods have high accuracy; however, they might not be suitable for on-board processing because of high computational complexity.…”
Section: Frame Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%