2003
DOI: 10.1159/000072312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adding Further Power to the Haseman and Elston Method for Detecting Linkage in Larger Sibships: Weighting Sums and Differences

Abstract: Haseman and Elston (H-E) proposed a robust test to detect linkage between a quantitative trait and a genetic marker. In their method the squared sib-pair trait difference is regressed on the estimated proportion of alleles at a locus shared identical by descent by sib pairs. This method has recently been improved by changing the dependent variable from the squared difference to the mean-corrected product of the sib-pair trait values, a significantly positive regression indicating linkage. Because situations ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The robustness of the power of the t test, which was used in the model-free quantitative trait linkage method of this article, 18 in the presence of nonnormality, is not well guaranteed as the robustness of the type I error. 19,20 Therefore, we performed commingling analyses for the covariate-adjusted traits using the program SEGREG implemented in S.A.G.E., during the process of which a Box-Cox power transformation was performed to simultaneously obtain normal and homoscedastic residuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robustness of the power of the t test, which was used in the model-free quantitative trait linkage method of this article, 18 in the presence of nonnormality, is not well guaranteed as the robustness of the type I error. 19,20 Therefore, we performed commingling analyses for the covariate-adjusted traits using the program SEGREG implemented in S.A.G.E., during the process of which a Box-Cox power transformation was performed to simultaneously obtain normal and homoscedastic residuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported previously, 14,20 we transformed non-zero SQ values to a natural log-scale or an indexed SQ, in which and squared mean corrected trait sum; the former adjusts for the non-independence of sib pairs while the latter adjusts for the non-independence of sib pairs and the non-independence of squared trait sums and differences. 30 Otherwise, default options were used for all parameters in the trait regression method. Sex and age were included as covariates for all analyses in the EA sample, and sex, age and ethnicity were included as covariates for the combined sample.…”
Section: Phenotype Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence for linkage was assessed by a HasemanElston regression with dependent variable options W3 and W4, which transforms the sib-pair's trait values to a weighted combination of the squared trait difference and squared-mean corrected trait sum, allowing for the non-independence of sib-pairs. 26 In SIBPAL, default options were used for all parameters in the trait regression method except that the options W3 (i.e., the weighted combination of squared trait difference and squared mean-corrected trait sum adjusting for the non-independence of sib-pairs) and W4 (i.e., the non-independence of squared trait sums and differences) were examined. Both options yielded essentially the same results on the three ND measures (SQ, HSI and FTND).…”
Section: Human Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%