2017
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-2017-246
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adding Four Dimensional Data Assimilation by Analysis Nudging to the Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmosphere (Version 4.0)

Abstract: Abstract. The Model for Prediction Across Scales -Atmosphere (MPAS-A

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study expands upon Bullock et al. (2018), only conducted for a winter and a summer month, by showing that MPAS can now be ran continuously with FDDA with no error growth at any level of the atmosphere.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This study expands upon Bullock et al. (2018), only conducted for a winter and a summer month, by showing that MPAS can now be ran continuously with FDDA with no error growth at any level of the atmosphere.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The MPAS configuration used here improves upon Bullock et al. (2018) by the implementation of the P‐X LSM and its indirect soil nudging scheme, as well as the ACM2 PBL scheme and the Pleim surface layer model. MPAS compares well with WRF over the CONUS for some variables and certain times of the year, but there are some instances where WRF has consistently lower error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, one should note that in the interest of a fair comparison, WRF in this study was used without the data assimilation framework of MeteoGroup that is applied in operational forecasting. The use of a data assimilation with MPAS is still under development with some early fruitful results (Ha et al 2017;Bullock et al 2018), but this may pose limitations to regular users for employing MPAS in an operational setup straight away. Additionally, the WRF model uses 39 vertical layers, while the MPAS model uses 55.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%