Adding Examples to the ASA-Physical Status Classification Improves Correct Assignment to Patients

Abstract

Background Despite its widespread use, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)-Physical Status Classification System has been shown to result in inconsistent assignments among anesthesiologists. The ASA-Physical Status Classification System is also used by nonanesthesia-trained clinicians and others. In 2014, the ASA developed and approved examples to assist clinicians in determining the correct ASA-Physical Status Classification System assignment. The effect of these examples by anesthesia-trained and nonanesthesia-trained clinicians on appropriate ASA-Physical Status Classification System assignment in hypothetical cases was examined. Methods Anesthesia-trained and nonanesthesia-trained clinicians were recruited via email to participate in a web-based questionnaire study. The questionnaire consisted of 10 hypothetical cases, for which respondents were first asked to assign ASA-Physical Status using only the ASA-Physical Status Classification System definitions and a second time using the newly ASA-approved examples. Results With ASA-approved examples, both anesthesia-trained and nonanesthesia-trained clinicians improved in mean number of correct answers (out of possible 10) compared to ASA-Physical Status Classification System definitions alone (P < 0.001 for all). However, with examples, nonanesthesia-trained clinicians improved more compared to anesthesia-trained clinicians. With definitions only, anesthesia-trained clinicians (5.8 ± 1.6) scored higher than nonanesthesia-trained clinicians (5.4 ± 1.7; P = 0.041). With examples, anesthesia-trained (7.7 ± 1.8) and nonanesthesia-trained (8.0 ± 1.7) groups were not significantly different (P = 0.100). Conclusions The addition of examples to the definitions of the ASA-Physical Status Classification System increases the correct assignment of patients by anesthesia-trained and nonanesthesia-trained clinicians.

Preoperative low skeletal muscle mass as a risk factor for pharyngocutaneous fistula and decreased overall survival in patients undergoing total laryngectomy

“…The American Society of Anesthesiologist's physical status classification was recorded as a surrogate marker for comorbidities. 18 Postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification of Surgical Complications. 19 Severe complications were defined as Clavien-Dindo grade 3A or higher.…”

Recognizing Risks and Optimizing Perioperative Care to Reduce Respiratory Complications in the Pediatric Patient

“…Although the interrater reliability has not been as predictive as in the adult population, the ASA’s modification in 2014 of the ASA classification with approved clinical scenarios tailored to each definition, could improve the interrate reliability [ 136 , 137 , 138 ].…”

Impact of body mass index on utilization of selected hospital resources for four common surgical procedures

“…The relatively small sample in each of the four surgical cohorts analysed in this study may also limit generalizability. We were unable to extract the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical classification scores to stratify patients according to disease burden and the technical difficulty of the surgery for a significant portion of patients, making it difficult to account for relative patient complexity as commonly reported in previous studies . The impact of unmeasured variables, such as procedural and anaesthetic delays, and variation in operator experience and perioperative delays on operating times were not recorded, and all of these are possible confounding variables.…”