2023
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adding confidence to our injury burden estimates: is bootstrapping the solution?

Sean Williams,
Joseph W Shaw,
Carolyn Emery
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 1 Incidence is reported as number of non-contact muscle injuries/1000 player hours of exposure (95% CI) 2 Data are reported as mean (± SD) 3 Injury burden = number of days lost/1000 hours of exposure (95% CI) [ 24 ] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 1 Incidence is reported as number of non-contact muscle injuries/1000 player hours of exposure (95% CI) 2 Data are reported as mean (± SD) 3 Injury burden = number of days lost/1000 hours of exposure (95% CI) [ 24 ] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were reported as means and standard deviation (SD) or 95% confidence interval (CI), as indicated [ 9 ]. The 95% CI for injury burden was computed via bootstrapping [ 24 ], with results based on 1000 bootstrap samples. The independent sample t-test was adopted for comparisons between different subgroups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%