2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3853961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addictive Platforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When platforms can endogenously choose the level of addictiveness, they opt to sacrifice quality for attention when consumers have a tight constraint on their attention level: in this situation, addictiveness does not change total attention. However, it influences how consumers split their attention between platforms: as such, increased competition could incentivise platforms to raise addictiveness and steal consumers from their rivals (Ichihashi & Kim, 2021).…”
Section: Attention Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When platforms can endogenously choose the level of addictiveness, they opt to sacrifice quality for attention when consumers have a tight constraint on their attention level: in this situation, addictiveness does not change total attention. However, it influences how consumers split their attention between platforms: as such, increased competition could incentivise platforms to raise addictiveness and steal consumers from their rivals (Ichihashi & Kim, 2021).…”
Section: Attention Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…relies on a custom-made application, whereas the primary data collection done in my paper relies on a (relatively) cheap, publicly available, parental control application and an open source Chrome extension which is more accessible to other researchers. Furthermore, unlike Allcott, Gentzkow and Song (2021), I can comprehensively track substitution towards other devices without having to rely on self-reported data.5 In the theory literature,Ichihashi and Kim (2021) study competition between addictive platforms where platforms trade off application quality for increased addictiveness. Hoong (2021) also studies the role of self-control issues in driving usage and commitment devices to reduce usage through a randomized experiment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%