2010
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.82.055805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addendum to “Behavior of a bipartite system in a cavity”

Abstract: This note is an Addendum to our previous article [Phys. Rev. A 81, 053820 (2010)]. We show that under the assumption of a Bose-Einstein distribution for the thermal reservoir, zero-temperature properties of the entangled states considered there are not changed by heating, for temperatures up to the order of room temperatures. In this case, the system is dissipative in free space and presents stability for a small cavity, both for T = 0 and for finite temperature.In this note we consider how heating could affec… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19] as a method to account, in a nonperturbative way, for the oscillator radiation process in free space. In subsequent works, the concept was used to study the spontaneous emission of atoms inside small cavities [20], the quantum Brownian motion [21,22], the thermalization process [23][24][25], the time evolution of bipartite systems [26][27][28], the entanglement of biatomic systems [29][30][31], and other related issues [32][33][34][35][36]. For a clear explanation, see reference [33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] as a method to account, in a nonperturbative way, for the oscillator radiation process in free space. In subsequent works, the concept was used to study the spontaneous emission of atoms inside small cavities [20], the quantum Brownian motion [21,22], the thermalization process [23][24][25], the time evolution of bipartite systems [26][27][28], the entanglement of biatomic systems [29][30][31], and other related issues [32][33][34][35][36]. For a clear explanation, see reference [33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%