2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01270-0_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptively Transforming Graph Matching

Abstract: Recently, many graph matching methods that incorporate pairwise constraint and that can be formulated as a quadratic assignment problem (QAP) have been proposed. Although these methods demonstrate promising results for the graph matching problem, they have high complexity in space or time. In this paper, we introduce an adaptively transforming graph matching (ATGM) method from the perspective of functional representation. More precisely, under a transformation formulation, we aim to match two graphs by minimiz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(98 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each partial graph represent with the partial adjacency matrix δ that apply it to any graph Ğ generated by our model and explore similarity between their , for finding best compatibility or a latent vector z* which can minimize differences between input and output graph, to provide more geometric insight on the problem. Process to measure similarities among elements of graphs with probing combination of dependences similar unary, pairwise or high-order [36,37,38] as well as there are Potentials between reference graph and their counterparts similar to [39,40] That follow a function is used for finding dissimilarity or deformation with a convex optimization problem over the set of doubly stochastic matrices.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each partial graph represent with the partial adjacency matrix δ that apply it to any graph Ğ generated by our model and explore similarity between their , for finding best compatibility or a latent vector z* which can minimize differences between input and output graph, to provide more geometric insight on the problem. Process to measure similarities among elements of graphs with probing combination of dependences similar unary, pairwise or high-order [36,37,38] as well as there are Potentials between reference graph and their counterparts similar to [39,40] That follow a function is used for finding dissimilarity or deformation with a convex optimization problem over the set of doubly stochastic matrices.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to consider: how to propose a graph matching model to address these variations and enhance the matching performance. To deal with this problem, some works using transformation strategy are proposed such as the variants of iterative closest point [35] [36], Mobius transformation [37] and adaptive transformation [38]. However, the DCM differs from these transformation methods and we make up for their deficiency in the following aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) The adaptive transformation in [38] is introduced to graph matching from the perspective of functional representation. In which the graph matching is formulated as transformation from one point set to the space spanned by another point set, and the pairwise edge features of graphs are directly represented by unary point features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the natural linearity of R d , T F can also be represented by a linear representation map P, which is not only a parameterization for GM but also associative with geometric parameters for graphs under geometric deformations. A preliminary version of this work was presented in [19]. nonlinear/complicate Figure 1: FRGM: given two graphs G 1 and G 2 , we construct two function spaces F(V 1 , R) and F(V 2 , R) as representations, where Φ and Ψ are two sets of basis functions that represent the nodes V 1 and V 2 , and F V1 and F V2 are the inner product or metric that represent the edge attributes E 1 and E 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%