2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-019-02011-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive weighted locality-constrained sparse coding for glaucoma diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For another, the performance of the proposed approach is compared against the state-of-the-art approaches, i.e., wavelet features [52], superpixel segmentation [53], semisupervised clustering [54], deep learning [55], and AWLCSC [31]. Table 5 shows the diagnosis results obtained by different algorithms on the REFUGE database and RIM-ONE r2 database, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For another, the performance of the proposed approach is compared against the state-of-the-art approaches, i.e., wavelet features [52], superpixel segmentation [53], semisupervised clustering [54], deep learning [55], and AWLCSC [31]. Table 5 shows the diagnosis results obtained by different algorithms on the REFUGE database and RIM-ONE r2 database, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In feature extraction stage, a series of important and distinctive hand-crafted features will be extracted to explore the concealed pixel variations in the retinal images. The extracted hand-crafted features are classified into wavelet decomposition-based features [29], morphological-based features [30], nonlinear-based features [31], textural-based features [32], and image descriptorbased features [33]. After feature extraction, the last process is classification.…”
Section: Machine Learning-(ml-) Basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the optic disc and optic cup boundaries extraction, we use the accuracy as a common measurement for glaucoma assessment. In this section, some state-of-the-art glaucoma diagnosis approaches are employed for verifying the effectiveness of the proposed approach, i.e., superpixel segmentation [3], wavelet features [44], multifeature fusion [45], deep learning [46], SDC [47], and AWLCSC [48]. Table 5 shows the classification results obtained by different algorithms on the DRISHTI-GS and RIM-ONE r2 databases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RIM-One-r2, published in 2014, is an extension of the first version having some duplicated images, containing 255 photographs of healthy eyes and 200 photos of patients with glaucoma at HUC and Hospital Universitário Miguel Servet using the same cameras as the previous version. Furthermore, medical experts manually segmented images [56,58].…”
Section: Public Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%