2017
DOI: 10.1166/jctn.2017.6633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Weighted Improved Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization for Optimal Distribution Network Reconfiguration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an attempt to expose the predominance of mGWO algorithm in tackling DNR problem, the viable indices that have obtained by FWA [16], CSA [17], RRA [18], IAICA [21], MBFOA [22] and AWIDPSO [25] techniques for test systems-I, and CSA [17], IAICA [21], MBFOA [22] and AWIDPSO [25] for test systems-II including mGWO were contrasted in Tables 3 and 4 respectively. The improvement in PLRI of mGWO over FWA [16], CSA [17], RRA [18], IAICA [21], MBFOA [22] and AWIDPSO [25] is 0.0375, 00286, 0.0353, 0.0357, 0.0104 and 0.0065 respectively in case of test system-I. Similarly, the PLRI has minimized by mGWO over CSA [17], IAICA [21], MBFOA [22], AWIDPSO [25] is 0.0074, 0.008, 0.0072 and 0.0048 respectively in case of test system-II.…”
Section: Comparison Of Viable Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In an attempt to expose the predominance of mGWO algorithm in tackling DNR problem, the viable indices that have obtained by FWA [16], CSA [17], RRA [18], IAICA [21], MBFOA [22] and AWIDPSO [25] techniques for test systems-I, and CSA [17], IAICA [21], MBFOA [22] and AWIDPSO [25] for test systems-II including mGWO were contrasted in Tables 3 and 4 respectively. The improvement in PLRI of mGWO over FWA [16], CSA [17], RRA [18], IAICA [21], MBFOA [22] and AWIDPSO [25] is 0.0375, 00286, 0.0353, 0.0357, 0.0104 and 0.0065 respectively in case of test system-I. Similarly, the PLRI has minimized by mGWO over CSA [17], IAICA [21], MBFOA [22], AWIDPSO [25] is 0.0074, 0.008, 0.0072 and 0.0048 respectively in case of test system-II.…”
Section: Comparison Of Viable Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, enhancement in NVDI of mGWO over FWA [16], CSA [17], RRA [18], IAICA [21] and AWIDPSO [25] is 0.0035, 0.0024, 0.0036, 0.007 and 0.0006 respectively in case of test system-I. At the same time, the NVDI has improved by mGWO is 0.0104, 0.0099 and 0.0077 higher than CSA [17], IAICA [21] and AWIDPSO [25] respectively in case of test system-II. Further, mGWO has minimized the power loss of 34.68%, 56.92% of test system-I and test system-II, respectively therefore, the proposed method offered the least network losses.…”
Section: Comparison Of Viable Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations