2007
DOI: 10.1109/jstsp.2007.897053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Waveform Design and Sequential Hypothesis Testing for Target Recognition With Active Sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
164
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
164
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The target impulse response for each hypothesis is denoted by g . The basic problem is to decide on one of the possible hypotheses using as few observations as possible, while maintaining the error rate under a tolerable level [32]. According to the MIMO radar signal model, the th hypothesis is written as…”
Section: Multitarget Recognition and Sequential Likelihood Ratio Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The target impulse response for each hypothesis is denoted by g . The basic problem is to decide on one of the possible hypotheses using as few observations as possible, while maintaining the error rate under a tolerable level [32]. According to the MIMO radar signal model, the th hypothesis is written as…”
Section: Multitarget Recognition and Sequential Likelihood Ratio Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, cognitive or knowledgeaided radar system [29][30][31] was proposed, in which the radar is capable of adaptively and intelligently interrogating the environment using many different kinds of available knowledge, such as the a priori knowledge as well as the knowledge from previous measurements. Sequential hypothesis test enables the radar to adjust its transmitted waveform based on its previous observations [28,[32][33][34] and is thus suitable for a cognitive radar framework. In this paper, sequential hypothesis testing for multitarget recognition is considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When classifying a target from multiple candidate targets, [7] proposed an integration of adaptive waveform design with a sequential hypothesis testing (SHT) to form a closed-loop radar (i.e. cognitive radar).…”
Section: B Targets Identification With Map-pwementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goodman et al derived a classification waveform algorithm for enhanced target classification by defining mutual information based on energy spectral variance (MIESV) across the transfer functions of the various target hypotheses in [1,2,3]. Energy spectral variance (ESV) quantifies the statistical variance over a set of finite-duration target transfer functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%