2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93713-7_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Time-Splitting Scheme for Nanoparticles Transport with Two-Phase Flow in Heterogeneous Porous Media

Abstract: In this work, we introduce an efficient scheme using an adaptive time-splitting method to simulate the problem of nanoparticles transport with a two-phase flow in heterogeneous porous media. The pressure and saturation equations are coupled with the capillary pressure which is linearized in terms of sat- The time step-sizes for saturation and concentration equations are adaptive under computing and satisfying the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL¡1) condition, iteratively. These results show the good performance of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The multi-scale time-splitting technique is therefore considered to be one of the major improvements in the treatment of the gap between pressure and concentration. In a number of publications, such as [10][11][12][13], the multi-scale time splitting method was considered. El-Amin et al [14] have developed a discrete-fracture-model with multi-scale time-splitting two-phase flow including nanoparticles transport in fractured porous media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-scale time-splitting technique is therefore considered to be one of the major improvements in the treatment of the gap between pressure and concentration. In a number of publications, such as [10][11][12][13], the multi-scale time splitting method was considered. El-Amin et al [14] have developed a discrete-fracture-model with multi-scale time-splitting two-phase flow including nanoparticles transport in fractured porous media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some numerical approximation schemes fail to preserve important physical and/or mathematical principles and lead to erroneous simulation results. For example, the continuous Galerkin finite element method is not locally mass conservative, while the mixed finite element methods (MFEM) [20][21][22][23][24][25] are all locally conservative. The mixed method is based on the conservation law together with the constitutive law for the flux in terms of pressure and solving the flux and the pressure together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%