2016
DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2016.070805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Threshold for Background Subtraction in Moving Object Detection using Stationary Wavelet Transforms 2D

Abstract: Abstract-Both detection and tracking objects are challenging problems because of the type of the objects and even their presence in the scene. Generally, object detection is a prerequisite for target tracking, and tracking has no effect on object detection. In this paper, we propose an algorithm to detect and track moving objects automatically of a video sequence analysis, taken with a fixed camera. In the detection steps we perform a background subtraction algorithm, the obtained results are decomposed using … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variations of pixel intensities were detected via a background subtraction technique (Zivkovic, 2004; Zivkovic & van der Heijden, 2006), making use of a predefined set of initial (reference) images of the membrane surface to arrive at a background probability density function (PDF) of the intensities for each pixel. During the RO pilot operation, membrane images from the RO membrane monitor were analyzed, and pixel intensities were compared with the background PDF pixel intensities (Boufares, Aloui, & Cherif, 2016). Corrections due to possible variability in illumination were made, relative to the reference image, via the image channel histogram matching technique (Bevilacqua & Azzari, 2007; Shapira, Avidan, & Hel‐Or, 2013), also using a lookup (indexing) algorithm (Bevilacqua & Azzari, 2007; Shapira et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Variations of pixel intensities were detected via a background subtraction technique (Zivkovic, 2004; Zivkovic & van der Heijden, 2006), making use of a predefined set of initial (reference) images of the membrane surface to arrive at a background probability density function (PDF) of the intensities for each pixel. During the RO pilot operation, membrane images from the RO membrane monitor were analyzed, and pixel intensities were compared with the background PDF pixel intensities (Boufares, Aloui, & Cherif, 2016). Corrections due to possible variability in illumination were made, relative to the reference image, via the image channel histogram matching technique (Bevilacqua & Azzari, 2007; Shapira, Avidan, & Hel‐Or, 2013), also using a lookup (indexing) algorithm (Bevilacqua & Azzari, 2007; Shapira et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indicators: FI, volumetric flow rate. Number of RO elements/vessel: PV-1A/B, four elements; PV-2A/B, three elements; PV-3, three elements; PV-4A, two elements; PV-5A: one element (Boufares, Aloui, & Cherif, 2016). Corrections due to possible variability in illumination were made, relative to the reference image, via the image channel histogram matching technique (Bevilacqua & Azzari, 2007;Shapira, Avidan, & Hel-Or, 2013), also using a lookup (indexing) algorithm (Bevilacqua & Azzari, 2007;Shapira et al, 2013).…”
Section: Membrane Surface and Performance Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%