2012 American Control Conference (ACC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2012.6315376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive switching controllers for systems with hybrid communication protocols

Abstract: Abstract-Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) are ubiquitous, motivated by the need to integrate control, computing, and communication, increasing capabilities and declining costs of the underlying technologies, and increased requirements on safety, reliability, and performance. The focus of this paper is the co-design of hybrid communication protocol and adaptive switching control that enables stabilization of multiple control applications using minimal communication resources. The hybrid protocol chosen is one that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The controller objective is then to restore both attitude and angular rates to a zero reference state. The initial conditions on the physical state representing this disturbance are defined as where states (1, 2, 3) are roll, pitch, and yaw in the LVLH reference frame, states (4, 5, 6) are elements of the angular velocity vector, and states (7,8,9) represent angular momentum of each of three reaction microwheels used in control. Because we are regulating states to zero, the reference trajectory is x p,r = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .…”
Section: A Physical Characteristics and Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The controller objective is then to restore both attitude and angular rates to a zero reference state. The initial conditions on the physical state representing this disturbance are defined as where states (1, 2, 3) are roll, pitch, and yaw in the LVLH reference frame, states (4, 5, 6) are elements of the angular velocity vector, and states (7,8,9) represent angular momentum of each of three reaction microwheels used in control. Because we are regulating states to zero, the reference trajectory is x p,r = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .…”
Section: A Physical Characteristics and Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Event-triggered or Lebesgue sampling holds promise for better resource utilization and control performance at the expense of scheduling complexity for the RTS [3]. Perhaps more importantly, although there has been some recent work exploring event-based feedback control [4]- [8], as well as a hybrid control approach that switches between Riemann and Lebesgue sampling [9], Lebesgue sampling is still a largely unexplored area relative to Riemann sampling [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this regard, there have been some works [126]- [129] which quantify the transient performance using ℒ 2 norm of error signals. However, only very few [130]- [132] have actually tried to consider cosynthesis of controller and platform parameters. Voit and Annaswamy [131] have derived an adaptive controller considering network induced delay.…”
Section: ) Input Saturationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows, we describe a scheme that realizes this [23]- [25]. Here, control messages are switched between TT and ET slots.…”
Section: Communication-aware Control Systems Designmentioning
confidence: 99%