2011
DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2010.2091641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Suppression of Multiple Time-Varying Unknown Vibrations Using an Inertial Actuator

Abstract: International audienceAn active vibration control system using an inertial actuator for suppression of multiple unknown and/or time-varying vibrations will be presented. The objective is to minimize the residual force by applying an appropriate control effort through the inertial actuator. The system does not use any additional transducer for getting in real-time information upon the disturbances. A direct feedback adaptive regulation scheme for the suppression of multiple unknown and/or time-varying vibration… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed description of the system can be found in [18]. The proposed method was used to design a controller capable of rejecting a sinusoidal disturbance with a time-varying frequency.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of the system can be found in [18]. The proposed method was used to design a controller capable of rejecting a sinusoidal disturbance with a time-varying frequency.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have recognized that the crucial task of enhanced MRAC for PMSM systems is to reject various external disturbances and improve robustness in various uncertainties. Landau et al proposed a direct feedback adaptive regulation scheme to suppress multiple unknown and/or time-varying vibrations, and minimized the residual force by applying an appropriate control effort through the internal model principle and Youla-Kucera parameterization [6]. However, performance is affected by the model and unmodeled dynamics because this approach introduced a dynamic model for external disturbances to the controller.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the normalizing signal m(k) is given by (17). In implementing the above scheme we also need to monitor the covariance matrix P (t) to make sure it does not become small in some directions i.e.…”
Section: B Adaptive Control Design: Unknown Disturbance Casementioning
confidence: 99%