2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive subject-based feature extraction in brain–computer interfaces using wavelet packet best basis decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows the signal processing steps involved in the analysis of the data. The entire dataset is divided into training and testing [17][18][19]. A common practice is to create a timefrequency distribution (TFD) of the recorded EEG using wavelet transforms and to define features using TFDs for various tasks.…”
Section: Experimental Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3 shows the signal processing steps involved in the analysis of the data. The entire dataset is divided into training and testing [17][18][19]. A common practice is to create a timefrequency distribution (TFD) of the recorded EEG using wavelet transforms and to define features using TFDs for various tasks.…”
Section: Experimental Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common practice is to create a timefrequency distribution (TFD) of the recorded EEG using wavelet transforms and to define features using TFDs for various tasks. This approach has been applied in movement and motor imagery studies [17,18]. Another technique is to use wavelet decomposition for de-noising data and improving its SNR.…”
Section: Experimental Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various techniques have been proposed to detect ERPs in spontaneous EEG, both in time and frequency domain. Among them are Fast-Fourier Transform [13], Wavelet Transform [10,[14][15][16], parametric modeling [12,[17][18][19], neural networks [4,12,20], event-synchronized epochs (EEG segments synchronized with events) averaging [7,21], event-related desynchronization and synchronization [22][23][24], linear discriminant analysis [14], principal components and independent components [25][26][27][28], and other kinds of filters, such as spatial filters [13,14,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] applied the wavelet transform on the uterine signals recorded using abdominal surface electrodes. In literature, the best basis algorithm is used to find the best-adapted WP for a lot of goals such the detection [8,9], denoising [10], feature extraction and classification [11,12], etc. Saito and Coifman introduced the Local Discriminant Bases (LDB) to search a best basis for classification [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%